Dismissed¶29

Shib Shankar Prasad v. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration

Patna HC22 Jan 2026MJC/4283/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt / non-compliance of writ order; A.C.P. scheme benefits; order dated 19.09.2024 in C.W.J.C. No. 14090 of 2024; compliance reply Annexure-R/A, Memo No. 1374 dated 23.01.2025; Bijay Kumar Sinha v. State of Bihar, C.W.J.C No. 14609 of 2010; General Administration Department, Government of Bihar; contempt proceeding dropped; M.J.C. dismissed; Patna High Court; Dr. Anshuman, J.; Shib Shankar Prasad v. State of Bihar.

What did the court decide?

None; the contempt proceeding was dropped and the M.J.C. petition dismissed. ¶29

Shib Shankar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4283 of 2024 In

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14090 of 2024

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shib Shankar Prasad Son of Late Dwarika Prasad, Resident of MohallaGuilli Bhatta Near West Railway Kebin, Shiv Mandir, Argara, P.S.-Sahebganj, District- Sahebganj (Jharkhand) at present Posted as Senior Deputy Collector, Munger.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

Dr. B. Rajendra, Son of Not known to the petitioner Principal Secretary, General Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

Principal Secretary, General Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

Md. Sohail, Son of Not Known to the petitioner, Secretary General Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶11

Secretary, General Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶12

Sri Sanjay Kumar, Son of Not known to the petitioner, Additional Secretary, General Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶13

Additional Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶14

Ravindra Chaudhary, Son of Not known to the petitioner, Deputy Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶15

Deputy Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶16

Sri Vinod Kumar Singh, Son of Not known to the petitioner, Under Secretary, General Administration, Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶17

Under Secretary, General Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶18

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶19

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhat Kumar (AC to GA-11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN

¶20

ORAL ORDER

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶22

5 22-01-2026

¶23

Patna High Court MJC No.4283 of 2024(5) dt.22-01-2026 2/3

¶24

counsel for the State.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 19.09.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14090 of 2024 has not been complied with.

¶26

Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 submits that in the said order dated 19.09.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14090 of 2024, it has been categorically observed by this Court in para 6 that “in the light of the observation made by this Hon’ble Court, it is directed to the respondent concerned to provide the benefits of the A.C.P scheme to the petitioner within four weeks from today if it has been found that petitioner’s case is squarely covered from the case of Bijay Kumar Sinha Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors in C.W.J.C No. 14609 of 2010 .” Counsel submits that in compliance of the said order dated 19.09.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14090 of 2024, AnnexureR/A has been annexed vide Memo No. 1374 dated 23.01.2025, wherein, it has been categorically stated in the different paragraphs that the case of present petitioner is different from the case of Bijay Kumar Sinha (supra) .

¶27

As such, this Court is of the firm view that the order dated 19.09.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14090 of 2024 has been fully complied with. Accordingly, the contempt proceeding

¶28

Patna High Court MJC No.4283 of 2024(5) dt.22-01-2026 3/3

¶29

is hereby dropped and the present M.J.C petition stands dismissed.

¶30

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶31

Divyansh/-

¶32

Shib Shankar Prasad v. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shib Shankar Prasad v. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Asgari Khatun Vs The State of Bihar

Mamta Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Zafrullah Ansari Vs Sri Pankaj Agrawal, The Secretary

Dr. Poonam Sagar Vs The State of Bihar

Sukhdeo Pandit @ Sukhdev Pandit Vs The State of Bihar, through Mr. Amrit Lal Meena, the Chief Secretary