Disposed¶26

Rashida Khatoon v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Jan 2026MJC/3371/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court MJC No.3371 of 2019 in CWJC No.16270 of 2016; Rashida Khatoon v. State of Bihar & Ors.; disposal of miscellaneous application as infructuous; compliance with Writ Court order recorded; Justice Alok Kumar Sinha; order dated 08-01-2026; procedural order with no statutory or precedent analysis.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of as having become infructuous following compliance with the order of the Writ Court. ¶26

Why is it important?

Rashida Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3371 of 2019

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16270 of 2016

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Rashida Khatoon W/o Late Syed Ashique, Resident of Mohalla- Dargah Shah Arjan, Police Station- Sultanganj, District- Patna.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through Mr. Deepak Kumar the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

Mr. Gupteshwar Pandey, Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Inspector General of Police, Government of BIhar, Patna.

¶11

Mr. Kumar Ravi, District Magistrate, District Patna.

¶12

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Superintendent of Police, Patna.

¶13

Rakesh Roshan, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Patna City, Patna.

¶14

Ravin Kumar Dubey, Circle Officer, Sadar, Patna.

¶15

Ajay Kumar the Secretary, Roop Narain Singh Trust, Mohalla-Diwan, Patna City, Patna.

¶16

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶17

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, SC-8

¶18

======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶20

4 08-01-2026

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties are present.

¶22

The defects as pointed out by the office is ignored.

¶23

Learned counsel, Ms. Shivani Mishra, junior counsel to Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate appears for the petitioner and submits that the order of the Writ Court has been complied with and, therefore, this application has become infructuous. She accordingly prays that an appropriate order be passed disposing of the present case.

¶24

Patna High Court MJC No.3371 of 2019(4) dt.08-01-2026 2/2

¶25

As prayed for, the present application is disposed of

¶26

as having become infructuous.

¶27

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

¶28

Prakash Narayan U

Rashida Khatoon v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

Rashida Khatoon v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nilesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sri Narayan Tiwary and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sabitri Verma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Chandan Kumar Upadhayay Vs The State of Bihar

Daud Ali Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Brajesh Tripathi, Vs The State of Bihar