Disposed¶23

Arjun Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 May 2026MJC/3092/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; MJC No.3092 of 2019; Arjun Sharma v. State of Bihar and others; contempt petition for willful disobedience of order dated 03.04.2019 in CWJC No. 6594 of 2016; Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar; Principal Secretary Sri Amrit Lal Meena; Deputy Development Commissioner cum CEO Zila Parishad Gaya Sri Kishori Chaudhary; Chairman Zila Parishad Gaya Smt Laxmi Devi; compliance shown by memo no. 531 dated 16.09.2019; cheque of Rs. 9,00,299/-; contempt petition disposed with liberty to agitate residual grievance; Justice Rajiv Roy; decided 05-05-2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to agitate the matter if any grievance still remains; contempt proceeding was not initiated. ¶23

Arjun Sharma Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3092 of 2019

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6594 of 2016

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Arjun Sharma S/o Late Ramjee Sharma, R/o village Dantpur, Hulasganj, District Gaya.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna Sri Amrit Lal Meena.

¶9

Sri Amrit Lal Meena, The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

Sri Kishori Chaudhary, The Deputy Development commissioner cum- Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Gaya District Gaya.

¶11

Smt Laxmi Devi, The Chairman, Zila Parishad, Gaya, District Gaya.

¶12

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance :

¶15

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, AC to AAG-6 ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶17

3 05-05-2026 Heard the parties.

¶18

The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

¶19

“for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 03.04.2019 passed in CWJC No. 6594 of 2016.”

¶20

A show cause has come on behalf of the opposite party nos. 3 and 4 and learned counsel for the opposite party has taken this Court to the order vide memo no. 531 dated

¶21

Patna High Court MJC No.3092 of 2019(3) dt.05-05-2026 2/2

¶22

16.09.2019 issued by the Deputy Development Commissioner cum Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Gaya to show that all the amount relating to the petitioner’s service has been cleared and a cheque of Rs. 9,00,299/- was issued accordingly.

¶23

Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.

¶24

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶25

Adnan/-

¶26

Arjun Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arjun Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Rajneesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gopal Prasad Patel @ Gopal Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Kanhaiya Kant Mishra Vs The National Highway Authority of India (Nhai)

Ram Babu Jha Social Worker Vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Commissioner Cum Secretary, Department Of Food, Civil Supply And Co.

Rekha Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar