Kshatradhari Singh v. The State of Bihar through Sri Anupam Kumar Suman, the Secretary-cum-Commissioner

Patna HC30 Jan 2026MJC/2605/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

MJC No.2605 of 2025, Patna High Court, Sunil Dutta Mishra J, decided 30-01-2026 (arising in CWJC No.16613 of 2024). Compliance-stage disposal: State reported compliance with the Court's earlier order via DCLR Sonepur letter no.667 dated 25.11.2025; petitioners granted liberty to challenge that letter by appropriate remedy. No statutory provisions or case law cited or discussed; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate remedy against the letter communicated to the petitioner vide letter no.667 dated 25.11.2025. ¶¶36

Kshatradhari Singh Vs The State of Bihar through Sri Anupam Kumar Suman, the Secretary-cum-Commissioner — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2605 of 2025

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16613 of 2024

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Kshatradhari Singh Son of Late Kapil Singh, Resident of VillageMalkhachak, P.O. and P.S. Dighwara, District Saran.

¶6

Pankaj Kumar Singh, Son of Late Sheo Nath Singh, Resident of Village Barbarriya Majhawan, P.S. Dighwara Nagar Panchayat, District Saran.

¶7

Rabindra Rai, Son of Late Indradeo Rai, Resident of Village- Farhada, P.O. and P.S.- Dighwara, District Saran.

¶8

Amar Nath Rai, Son of Late Bhuda Rai, Resident of Village- Farhada, P.O. and P.S. Dighwara, District Saran.

¶9

Daya Nand Rai, Son of Late Munshi Rai, Resident of Village- Farhada, P.O. and P.S. Dighwara, District Saran.

¶10

Sudhir Singh, Son of Maheshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of VillageMalkhachak, P.O. and P.S. Dighwara, District Saran.

¶11

... ... Petitioner/s

¶12

Versus

¶13

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Anupam Kumar Suman, the Secretary-cumCommissioner Government of Bihar Old Secretariat Building, Patna.

¶14

Sri Rajesh Meena, the Collector, Saran, Chapra.

¶15

Rashmi Kumari, the Deputy Collector Land Reforms (D.C.L.R) Sonepur, District- Saran.

¶16

Sri Rahul Kumar, the Circle Officer, Dighwara, District Saran.

¶17

Bhuar Mahto, Son of Ram Bilash Mahto, Resident of Village- Shankarpur P.O. and P.S. Sahpur, District Patna.

¶18

Suresh Rai, Son of late Sita Ram Rai, Resident of Village Bishunpur, P.O. and P.S. Dighwara, District Saran.

¶19

Sachita Rai, Son of Sita Ram Rai, Resident of Village- Shankarpur, P.O. and P.S. Sahpur, District Patna.

¶20

Premdhar Rai, Son of Dharikshan Rai, Resident of Village- Shankarpur, P.O. and P.S. Sahpur, District Patna.

¶21

Arun Mahto, Son of Vishwanath Mahto, Resident of Village- Saidpur, P.O. and P.S.- Dighwara, District Saran.

¶22

Bhaju Mahto, Son of Shiva Mahto, Resident of Village Saidpur, P.O. and P.S. Dighwara, District Saran.

¶23

Baijnath Mahto, Son of Ram Ishwar Mahto, Resident of Village Sahpur Shankarpur, P.O. and P.S. Dighwara, District- Patna.

¶24

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Advocate.

¶25

Patna High Court MJC No.2605 of 2025(5) dt.30-01-2026 2/2

¶26

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Santosh Chandra Bhaskar, GP-11

¶27

======================================================

¶28

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶29

5 30-01-2026

¶30

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶31

counsel for the State.

¶32

Learned counsel for the State submits that the order

¶33

of this Court has already been complied with and the opposite party no.3 i.e. D.C.L.R., Sonpur has already issued letter no.667 dated 25.11.2025 in compliance therewith.

¶34

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate remedy against the letter communicated to the petitioner vide letter no.667 dated 25.11.2025.

¶35

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner.

¶36

Accordingly, the present Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for.

¶37

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)

¶38

Ritik/-

¶39

Kshatradhari Singh v. The State of Bihar through Sri Anupam Kumar Suman, the Secretary-cum-Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kshatradhari Singh v. The State of Bihar through Sri Anupam Kumar Suman, the Secretary-cum-Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Singh @ Dablu Singh and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Punpun Pandey @ Vishnudeo Pandey and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Kamlesh Kumar Pandey and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Shiv Jee Prasad @ Shiv Jee Prasad Sonar and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Krishna Kumar @ Keenu Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar