Allowed¶22

Gayatri Devi v. The State of Bihar through its Secretary, Registration Excise and Prohibition Department, Patna

Patna HC1 May 2026MJC/232/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; MJC No.232 of 2026 in CWJC No.21662 of 2018; Gayatri Devi v. State of Bihar (Registration Excise and Prohibition Department), Collector Vaishali, Sub Registrar Lalganj and Nand Lal Rai; restoration of writ petition dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 14.05.2025; restoration allowed; issuance of notices; listing after four weeks; Alok Kumar Sinha, J.; order dated 01-05-2026.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of CWJC No.21662 of 2018 to its original file; office directed to proceed with issuance of notices already filed by the petitioner in compliance of order dated 14.05.2025; writ application to be put up after four weeks. ¶22

Gayatri Devi Vs The State of Bihar through its Secretary, Registration Excise and Prohibition Department, Patna — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.232 of 2026 In

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21662 of 2018

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Gayatri Devi W/o Arjun Singh R/o Village- Shyampur, P.O.- Haujpura, P.S.Vaishali, District- Vaishali.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through its Secretary, Registration Excise and Prohibition Department, Patna Bihar.

¶8

The Collector, Vaishali.

¶9

The Sub Registrar, Lalganj, Vaishali.

¶10

Nand Lal Rai, S/o Late Dwarika Rai, Resident of Village- Shyampur, P.S.Hanjpura, P.S.- Vaishali, Dist- Vaishali.

¶11

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs.Rina Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Standing Counsel-11 ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 01-05-2026

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for opposite party State are present.

¶17

The writ application bearing CWJC No.21662 of 2018 was dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 14.05.2025.

¶18

This application has been filed for restoration of the writ application for the reasons as stated in the application.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing for respondent-State has no objection to the restoration of the CWJC No.21662 of 2018 to its original file.

¶20

For the reasons as stated in this application, this

¶21

Patna High Court MJC No.232 of 2026(3) dt.01-05-2026 2/2

¶22

application is allowed and CWJC No.21662 of 2018 is directed to be restored to its original file.

¶23

Since the notices have already been filed by the

¶24

petitioner in compliance of order dated 14.05.2025, therefore, office is directed to proceed with the issuance of the same.

¶25

Put up the writ application after four weeks.

¶26

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

¶27

Prakash Narayan U

Gayatri Devi v. The State of Bihar through its Secretary, Registration Excise and Prohibition Department, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gayatri Devi v. The State of Bihar through its Secretary, Registration Excise and Prohibition Department, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Taufik Alam Vs The Union of India

Md. Mustaque Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar

Priti Kumari Vs Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University

Jaikrishna Jha Vs Lalit Narayan Mithila University Darbhanga through its Vice-Chancellor

Ram Pukar Ray Vs The State of Bihar through Mr.B. Rajendra, Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department

Kamal Kumar Choudhary @ Kamal Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar