Raushan Ranjan @ Raushan Rajan v. The Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. through its Manager Claim
Case brief
What is this about?
Restoration petition dismissed for non-prosecution — Patna High Court, MJC No. 2275 of 2024 (in MA No. 238 of 2017), Rajiv Roy, J., decided 05-03-2025. Petitioners (children of Late Ramdeo Prasad, residents of Belaganj, District Gaya) sought restoration of their miscellaneous appeal dismissed on 06.01.2023 for non-compliance of the order dated 08.12.2022. Opposite parties: Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. (insurer of Auto Tempo No. BR-2M/0828) and Rahul Kumar (vehicle owner). With no appearance for the petitioners when called, the Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. Keywords: restoration of appeal, dismissal for non-prosecution, non-appearance of counsel, miscellaneous jurisdiction case, vehicle insurance, Auto Tempo BR-2M/0828.
What did the court decide?
When the matter was called on, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners.