Plaintiff challenged the trial court's order allowing the defendant to amend the verification of his written statement by deleting words admitting tenancy of the plaintiff. The High Court found no illegality in the impugned order and upheld it, dismissing the civil miscellaneous application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1529 of 2017
======================================================
Satya Nand Sharma S/o Late Raghubansh Ojha, Resident of Village and PostKhabra, P.S. Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Niraj Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER
10 12-01-2026
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of both the
parties.
the admission from the defendant.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1529 of 2017(10) dt.12-01-2026 2/3
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1529 of 2017(10) dt.12-01-2026 3/3
expression “tenant of the plaintiff situated” appearing in the verification clause of the written statement does not amount to an admission, and has further rightly held that allowing the amendment petition would not cause any prejudice to the plaintiff.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J)
Ankit Kumar/-
U
2 issues framed by the court
Was the trial court justified in allowing amendment of the written statement deleting the admission that the defendant was a tenant of the plaintiff?
Did the amendment cause prejudice to the plaintiff by withdrawing an admission?
Satya Nand Sharma
Mahesh Ram
Ganesh Ram
Kiran Kumari
Rupa Kumari
S. B. Pd. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
