Dismissed¶26

The Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Mumbai v. Pinky Singh and Ors.

Patna HC6 Feb 2026MA/723/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Insurer's miscellaneous appeal (MA No.723 of 2013, Patna High Court, Rajiv Roy, J.) against S.140 Motor Vehicles Act compensation award of District Judge, Bhagalpur (Claim Case No. 48 of 2012, Pinky Singh & Ors v. Chandan Kumar Yadav & Ors, order dt. 01.08.2013); dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's prayer for withdrawal; statutory deposit, if any, to be returned; no merits argued, no precedents cited; order dt. 06-02-2026.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; appeal dismissed as withdrawn, with direction that the statutory amount, if any, be returned. ¶26

The Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Mumbai… — Motor Accident Claims | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.723 of 2013

¶2

======================================================

¶3

The Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Mumbai The Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, 3rd Floor, Kaushalaya Estate, Bander Bagicha, Patna

¶4

... ... Appellant/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

Pinky Singh W/O Lt. Laxman Kumar Singh Resident Of Village Banama, P.O. Pachrukhi, P.S. Sahkund, District Bhagalpur.

¶7

Lovely Kumari D/O Lt. Laxman Kumar Singh (Minor And Is Under The Natural Guardian Mother, Res. 1) Resident Of Village Banama, P.O. Pachrukhi, P.S. Sahkund, District Bhagalpur.

¶8

Devanand S/O Lt. Laxman Kumar Singh (Minor And Is Under The Natural Guardian Mother, Res. 1) Resident Of Village Banama, P.O. Pachrukhi, P.S. Sahkund, District Bhagalpur.

¶9

Jogmaya Devi W/O Lt. Nagashwar Prasad Singh Resident Of Village Banama, P.O. Pachrukhi, P.S. Sahkund, District Bhagalpur.

¶10

Chandan Kumar Yadav S/O Lt. Shiv Yadav Resident Of Village Bishanpur Jichho, P.O. Jichho, P.S. Lodipur, District Bhagalpur Owner Cum Driver Of Vehicle.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance :

¶13

For the Appellant/s : Mr.Durgesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

ORAL ORDER

7 06-02-2026

Heard the parties.

The present petition has been preferred for the

¶19

following relief/s:

¶20

“against the order dated 01.08.2013 passed by learned District Judge, Bhagalpur(hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in Claim Case No. 48 of 2012 ‘Pinky Sing & Ors vs. Chandan Kumar

¶21

Patna High Court MA No.723 of 2013(7) dt.06-02-2026 2/2

¶22

Yadav & Ors’ by which compensation u/s 140 of the M.V. Act has been allowed against

¶23

the appellant”.

¶24