Miscellaneous appeal by an insurance company against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award granting accident compensation; counsel for the appellant prayed for withdrawal of the petition at the hearing and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.248 of 2023
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr.Durgesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
4 24-02-2026 Heard the parties.
following relief/s:
(i) against the order/judgment dated 15.02.2022 passed by Sri Amitava Choudhary, learned 3rd Additional District & Sessions Judge- cum- 3rd Motor Vehicle
Patna High Court MA No.248 of 2023(4) dt.24-02-2026
2/2
Accident Claim Tribunal, Naugachia (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), in Claim Case No. 71 of 2019 'Rekha Devi and Anr. v/s ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited and others' by which compensation has been allowed against the appellant, appellant beg to move this memo of appeal on the following amongst other.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
U
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited
Rekha Devi
Subodh Ram
Manohar Sagar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
