Dismissed¶¶31

Ram Narayan Renu and Ors. v. Dr. Hari Narayan Prasad Singh

Patna HC5 Jan 2026FA/34/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

First appeal dismissed for default / non-prosecution; appellants and their counsel absent on multiple dates (09.09.2025, 25.09.2025, 20.11.2025) and on hearing date despite repeated calls; dismissal under Order 41 Rule 17 CPC; respondents' counsel (Mr. Sunil Kumar) present; Patna High Court, FA No.34 of 2011, Ramesh Chand Malviya, J., 05-01-2026; no adjudication on merits; no cases or monetary amounts involved.

What did the court decide?

As nobody appeared on behalf of the appellants even on repeated calls, the first appeal is dismissed for default under Order 41 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. ¶¶31

Ram Narayan Renu and Ors. Vs Dr. Hari Narayan Prasad Singh — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FIRST APPEAL No.34 of 2011

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ram Narayan Renu, Son of Late Bhola Mahto.

¶4

Krishna Prasad Son of Late Bhola Mahto.

¶5

Jaynendra Kumar, Son of Late Bhola Mahto.

¶6

Rampari Devi, Daughter of Bhola Mahto.

¶7

Jitendra Narayan Sinha.

¶8

Bhagwati Charan.

¶9

Avinash Kumar.

¶10

Appellant nos. 5 to 7 are sons of Dr. Raghunandan Prasad

¶11

Indu Kumari.

¶12

Madhuri Kumari.

¶13

Kumari Kiran Prabha.

¶14

Supriya Sinha.

¶15

All Appellant no. 8 to 11, Daughter of Raghunandan Prasad. 12. Dr. Raghunandan Prasad, Son of Late Bhikhari Mahta. All residents of Village-Daha Bigha, P.S. Hilsa, District- Nalanda at present residing at J-55, peoples Co-operative Colony, Kankarbagh, Patna.

¶16

... ..Plaintiff/s . Appellant/s

¶17

Versus

¶18

Dr. Hari Narayan Prasad Singh Son of Late Chhotan Mahto, resident of Village-Shanti Bhawan Sathopur, P.S. Deep Nagar, District- Nalanda.

¶19

Ram Lakhan Prasad Singh, Son of Late Chhotan Mahto, resident of Navneet Colony, Hanuman Nagar, P.S. Hanuman Nagar, District- Patna. 3. Rajeev Prasad, Son of Late Diwakar Sharma @ Saryug Prasad.

¶20

Smt. Sharda Devi, Wife of Shobhi Mahto.

¶21

Resident of Village- Daha Bigha, P.S. Hilsa, District- Nalanda at present residing at D/46, P.C. Colony, Kankarbagh, P.S. Kankarbagh, District- Patna.

¶22

... ... Respondent/s

¶23

====================================================== Appearance :

¶24

For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate ======================================================

¶25

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER

¶26

34 05-01-2026

¶27

On several dates i.e., on 09.09.2025, 25.09.2025 and

¶28

20.11.2025, nobody appears on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellants.

¶29

On perusal of the records, it appears that this first appeal is of the year 2011 and the appellants are absented from

¶30

Patna High Court FA No.34 of 2011(34) dt.05-01-2026 2/2

¶31

several dates and even today on repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the appellants, so in this circumstances, this first appeal is dismissed for default under Order 41 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

¶32

Nobody appears on behalf of learned counsel for

¶33

the appellants. Learned counsel for the respondents is present.

¶34

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶35

Anand Kr.

¶36

Ram Narayan Renu and Ors. v. Dr. Hari Narayan Prasad Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Narayan Renu and Ors. v. Dr. Hari Narayan Prasad Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhola Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Lt. Col. R. T. D. Rabindra Narayan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajmanti Devi and Ors. Vs Sri Nand Lal Singh and Ors.

Shiv Chandra Bhagat Vs Kailash Sah