Disposed¶23

Kumari Rani v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jul 2026CWJC/9676/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

GTR correction; General Tabulation Register; Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board (BSSB); father's name in place of husband's name; Chandeshwar Ram; Dev Ranjan Kumar; representation dated 11.06.2026; Annexure-P/7; direction to consider representation within two weeks; Sitamarhi; Education Department, Government of Bihar; writ application disposed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 4 (Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board) to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.06.2026 and take appropriate action in accordance with law within two weeks from the date of the order. ¶23

Kumari Rani Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9676 of 2026

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Kumari Rani W/o Dev Ranjan Kumar (Fathers Name - Chandeshwar Ram), R/o village Vishwanathpur, P.O. - Dumra, P.S. - Dumra, Dist. - Sitamarhi.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate, District Nazarat Section, Collectariate, Sitamarhi.

¶8

The Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board, through its Secretary, Patna.

¶9

The Secretary Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board, Patna.

¶10

The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board, Patna.

¶11

The Examination Controller, Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board, Patna.

¶12

The Incharge, GTR (General Tabulation Register) Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board, Patna.

¶13

The Principal Srimati Mithila Devi Sanskrit Primary Cum Middle and High School Parsauni, Dumra, Sitamarhi.

¶14

The District Najarat Cum Deputy Collector, Sitamarhi.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel (12) For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, SC-12 Mr. Anuj Kumar, AC to SC-12 For BSSB : Mr. Satyam Shivam Sundaram, Advocate ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶18

2 22-07-2026

¶19

Heard Sri Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Satyam Shivam Sundaram, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 and Sri Anuj Kumar, learned AC to SC-12.

¶20

The petitioner in present writ application has prayed for making correction in GTR (General Tabulation Register) and in other required and necessary records of the Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board, Patna by inserting and feeding the

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.9676 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/2

¶22

name of father of petitioner as Chandeshwar Ram in place of her husband Dev Ranjan Kumar and in this regard has made representation to the concerned authorities on 11.06.2026 which forms as Annexure-P/7 to the writ application and submitted that till date no decision has been taken by respondent no.4. At this juncture, the petitioner confines her prayer for disposal of pending representation.

¶23

Accordingly, the present writ application is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 4 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner and to take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of order.

¶24

(Vikash Kumar, J)

¶25

sweta/-

¶26

Kumari Rani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumari Rani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amarjeet Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rajnish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amrit Raj Ranjan @ Amrit Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Subodhkant Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Nasim Ahmed Vs The State of Bihar

Uttam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar