Arvind Narayan Singh v. The T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur

Patna HC10 Apr 2026CWJC/9266/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

T.M. Bhagalpur University; superannuation benefits; parity with Shanti Singh, CWJC No. 16128 of 2019 (order dated 24.10.2024, Co-ordinate Bench, Patna High Court); similarly situated claimants; disposal in light of earlier order; three-month decision and compliance direction; CWJC Nos. 8839, 7822 and 9266 of 2022; B.N. College Bhagalpur; State of Bihar Education Department; Ajit Kumar, J.

What did the court decide?

Writ applications disposed of in light of Shanti Singh (supra); authorities to take necessary decision within three months and, if the petitioners are found entitled on adjudication, extend to them all benefits at par with Shanti Singh within the same time. ¶¶69

Arvind Narayan Singh Vs The T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶69

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioners, claiming to be squarely covered by the Co-ordinate Bench judgment dated 24.10.2024 in CWJC No. 16128 of 2019 (Shanti Singh vs. T.M. Bhagalpur University & Ors.), are entitled to similar superannuation benefits from T.M. Bhagalpur University.

¶¶62

Court's answer

All the writ applications are disposed of in the light of the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of the Patna High Court in Shanti Singh (supra).

¶¶68

Ratio / Principle

A necessary decision is to be taken within a period of three months, and all benefits at par with Shanti Singh (supra) for which the petitioners are found entitled on adjudication shall be extended to the petitioners within the same time.

¶¶68

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Patna High Court (Ajit Kumar, J.) disposed of three connected writ petitions — Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8839 of 2022 (Punam Devi), No. 7822 of 2022 (Anupam Anand Verdhan) and No. 9266 of 2022 (Arvind Narayan Singh and Lalan Kumar Choudhary) — directed against T.M. Bhagalpur University, its officers and the State of Bihar. The petitioners claimed to be squarely covered by the Co-ordinate Bench order dated 24.10.2024 in CWJC No. 16128 of 2019 (Shanti Singh vs. T.M. Bhagalpur University & Ors.), pursuant to which the University is stated to have extended the Court-directed superannuation benefits. Counsel for the University did not dispute the claim; counsel for the State submitted that the authorities be directed to decide the petitioners' claims and extend similar benefits if found similarly situated on adjudication. The Court disposed of all the writ applications in the light of Shanti Singh (supra), expecting a necessary decision within three months and extension, within the same time, of all benefits at par with Shanti Singh for which the petitioners are found entitled on adjudication.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8839 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Punam Devi W/o Late Ravindra Prasad Sinha, Resident of - 40, Baba Tola, Kheraihiya, Akbarnagar, P.S.- Akbarnagar, District - Bhagalpur, PIN Code813223.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The T.M Bhagalpur University Bhagalpur, through its Registrar.

¶7

The Vice-Chancellor, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

¶8

The Pro Vice-Chancellor, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

¶9

The Financial Advisor, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

¶10

The Finance Officer, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

¶11

The Principal, B.N. College, Bhagalpur, Town and District - Bhagalpur.

¶12

The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶13

The Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶14

The Director, Department of Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

======================================================

¶17

with

¶18

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7822 of 2022

¶19

======================================================

¶20

Anupam Anand Verdhan S/o Late Shiv Nandan Prasad, Resident of Naisheel Niketan, U.N. Bagchi Road, Mashakchak, Bhagalpur, Bihar - 812001.

¶21

... ... Petitioner/s

¶22

Versus

¶23

The T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur through its Registrar.

¶24

The Vice - Chancellor, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

¶25

The Registrar, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

¶26

The Financial Advisor, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

¶27

The Finance Officer, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

¶28

The Principal, B.N. College, Bhagalpur, Town and District - Bhagalpur.

¶29

The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶30

The Secretary Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶31

The Director, Department of Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶32

... ... Respondent/s

¶33

======================================================

¶34

Patna High Court CWJC No.8839 of 2022(9) dt.10-04-2026 2/4

¶35

with

¶36

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9266 of 2022

¶37

======================================================

¶38

Arvind Narayan Singh S/o Late Baldeo Prasad Singh Resident of Radha Rani Sinha Road, Adampur, P.S.- Adampur, District- Bhagalpur.

¶39

Lalan Kumar Choudhary S/o Late Jyotish Chandra Choudhary Resident of Village and Post- Marwa, P.S.- Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur.

¶40

... ... Petitioner/s

¶41

Versus

¶42

The T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur through its Registrar,

¶43

The Vice Chancellor, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

The Pro Vice-Chancellor, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

¶49

The Financial Advisor, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

¶50

The Finance Officer, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

¶51

The Principal, B.N. College, Bhagalpur, Town and District- Bhagalpur.

¶52

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶53

The Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶54

The Director, Department of Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶55

... ... Respondent/s

¶56

====================================================== Appearance : (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8839 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Purushottam Kumar Jha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Ram Vinay Pd. Singh, AC to GAXII For the TM Univ. : Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv. (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7822 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Purushottam Kumar Jha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra (Sc16) For the TMB University : Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv. (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9266 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Purushottam Kumar Jha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra (Sc16) For the TMB University : Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv. ======================================================

¶57

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶58

9 10-04-2026

¶59

Heard learned counsel for the parties in all the cases.

¶60

Counsel for the petitioners, by referring to the

¶61

Patna High Court CWJC No.8839 of 2022(9) dt.10-04-2026 3/4

¶62

judgment rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.10.2024 passed in CWJC No. 16128 of 2019 ( Shanti Singh vs. T.M. Bhagalpur University & Ors. ), submits that the cases of the petitioners are squarely covered by the said judgment and, therefore, these cases may also be disposed of in similar terms.

¶63

It is next submitted that, pursuant to the order passed in the aforementioned case, the authorities of T. M. Bhagalpur University are said to have complied the direction so issued and the superannuation benefits, which have been directed by the Court, the same has been extended as per its entitlement.

¶64

Counsel for the respondent State submits that the authorities may be directed to decide the claim of the petitioners and extend the similar benefits as has been granted to Shanti Singh (supra), if the cases of these petitioners are also found to be similarly situated, on its adjudication.

¶65

On the other hand, counsel for the T.M. Bhagalpur University does not dispute the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners and submits that these cases may be disposed of in the similar terms by directing the authorities to extend similar benefits, if the case of these petitioners are found

¶66

Patna High Court CWJC No.8839 of 2022(9) dt.10-04-2026 4/4

¶67

to be similar on adjudication.

¶68

Considering the stand of the parties, all these writ applications are disposed of in the light of the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of “Shanti Singh” (supra) and, it is expected that necessary decision shall be taken within a period of three months from today and all such benefits for which these petitioners are found entitled at par with that of Shanti Singh (supra) on its adjudication, the same shall also be extended to the petitioners, within the same time.

¶69

With the aforementioned observation and direction, all the writ applications are disposed of.

¶70

(Ajit Kumar, J)

¶71

rishi/-

¶72

Arvind Narayan Singh v. The T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvind Narayan Singh v. The T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uday Prakash Narayan Vs The State of Bihar, through its Principal Secretary

Richa Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Jakir Vs The State of Bihar

Vinay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Punam Devi Vs The T.M Bhagalpur University

Anupam Anand Verdhan Vs The T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur