Disposed¶28

Suresh Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jun 2026CWJC/8167/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: alternative remedy; writ petition disposed; advice to file Revision before appropriate authority; Anchal Adhikari Silao notice Memo No. 1134 dated 22.04.2026; Land Dispute Case No. 16 of 2025-26; Land Reforms Deputy Collector Rajgir; certiorari; mandamus; protection and security over land-in-question; Nalanda (Silao/Rajgir/Juafardih); State of Bihar revenue authorities; private respondent Kumar Kishore Nanda; Patna High Court CWJC No.8167 of 2026; Justice Alok Kumar.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; the writ petition was disposed of with a direction advising the petitioners to file a Revision before the appropriate authority in view of the alternative remedy available. ¶28

Suresh Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8167 of 2026

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Suresh Prasad Son of Late Bhatu Mahto @ Bhotto Singh, resident of Village- Juafardih, Police Station-Nalanda, District-Nalanda (Bihar).

¶4

Naresh Prasad @ Sri Naraian, Son of Late Bhatu Mahto @ Bhotto Singh, resident of Village- Juafardih, Police Station-Nalanda, District-Nalanda (Bihar).

¶5

Rabi Bhushan Kumar, Son of Late Bhatu Mahto @ Bhotto Singh, resident of Village- Jufardih, Police Station-Nalanda, District-Nalanda (Bihar).

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The District Magistrate -cum- Collector, Nalanda, District- Nalanda.

¶11

The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Rajgir (Nalanda), District-Nalanda.

¶12

The Circle Officer, Silao, Anchal-Silao, District- Nalanda.

¶13

Kumar Kishore Nanda, Son of Late Banke Prasad Singh, resident of VillageJufardih, Police Station-Nalanda, District-Nalanda.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Divit Vinod, AC to SC-26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR

¶16

ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 24-06-2026

¶18

Heard Sri Rabindra Prasad Singh, learned counsel

¶19

for the petitioners and Sri Divit Vinod, learned counsel for the State.

¶20

The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:

¶21

“That this writ petition is being

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.8167 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026 2/3

¶23

filed on behalf of the petitioners for issuance of an order/orders/ direction/ directions writ in nature of certiorari to setaside the notice vide Memo No. 1134 dated 22.04.2026 passed by the Anchal Adhikari, Silao, Nalanda in pursuance of order passed in Land Dispute Case No. 16 of 2025-26 passed by the Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Rajgir, Nalanda whereby and whereunder the Anchala Adhikari, Silao, Nalanda has ordered to not approach at the land of the respondent No. 6 to others persons as the land mentioned in notice dated 22.04.2026 belongs to the petitioners, the respondents have passed order without inquiry and verification of relevant documents of the land in question and thereafter the notice dated 22.04.2026 is not proper and it may be set-aside for the ends of justice.

¶24

(ii) And further be pleased to pass an order/orders/direction/ directions writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding to the Respondents to give full protection and security over the land-inquestion to the petitioners.

¶25