Shiv Kant Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel (6) ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANA VIKRAM SINGH

¶18

ORAL ORDER

¶19

2 23-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶20

The petitioner instead of approaching the statutory

¶21

body i.e. the Bihar Land Tribunal, directly approached this

¶22

Hon’ble Court for the reliefs as prayed for in paragraph no. 1 of the writ petition:-

¶23

“i) To issue appropriate writ holding that the order order of Ld. Additional Collector dated 3001-2024 as well as order of Ld. LRDC dated 21-102022 is illegal and hence set aside the same.

¶24

(ii) To issue an appropriate writ(s) directing respondents to confirm the order dated 28-03-2017 passed by the Ld. Anchaladhikari (Circle Officer) Jagdishpur, Block in Mutation Case no. 10016/201617.

¶25

(iii) To pass such order/orders direction/directions for which petitioner is entitled in

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No. 7602 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/4

¶27

the facts and circumstances of the instant case.”

¶28

At this stage, learned counsel for the State raises preliminary objection to the effect that statutory alternative remedy is available to the petitioner. He submits that during pendency of the writ petition, Bihar Land Tribunal has become functional and proviso to Section 15 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009 which reads as “Provided further that it shall be open to the High Court of Judicature at Patna to remit the dispute pending adjudication in any writ proceeding before it for adjudication by the Tribunal”.

¶29

Section 15 of the Act of 2009 stipulates that all cases connected with the Acts/Manuals dealt with under Section 9 of this Act and pending in the High Court of Judicature at Patna, but excluding writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and cases pending with the State Government, immediately before the commencement of this Act, as could have been within the jurisdiction of such Tribunal, and cases arsing after the commencement of this Act, as would have been within the jurisdiction of such Tribunal, shall stand transferred to the Tribunal with effect from the said date of commencement.

¶30

Section 9 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009 delineate the power of the Bihar Land Tribunal to entertain

¶31

Patna High Court CWJC No. 7602 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 3/4

¶32

applications related to the Acts as mentioned hereunder:-

¶33

“(i) The Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961

¶34

(ii) The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950

¶35

(iii) The Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 (iv) The Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 (v) [xxx]

¶36

(vi) The Bihar Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1954 (vii) The Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947

¶37

(viii) The Bihar Government Estates Manual, 1953

¶38

(ix) The Bihar Settlement Manual

¶39

2[(x) Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009 (xi) Bihar Special Survey and Settlement Act, 2011

¶40

(xii) Bihar Land Mutation Act, 2011” Further Section 9(2) of the Act (supra) says :-

¶41

“ (2) In addition, the Tribunal shall decide any case

¶42

transferred to it by the Government of Bihar or by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Patna with regard to any other revenue or land reforms Law/Manual for the time being in force.”

¶43

In this backdrop learned counsel for the petitioner prays for disposal of the writ application granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Bihar Land Tribunal for proper adjudication of the matter.

¶44

In view of the aforesaid submission, let the petitioner file a fresh application before the Bihar Land Tribunal for adjudication of the matter, within a period of six weeks from

¶45

Patna High Court CWJC No. 7602 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 4/4

¶46

the date of receipt of this order.

¶47

It goes without saying that if any question of limitation arises before the competent authority, the same shall be considered taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the issue before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

¶48

Thus the writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶49

(Rana Vikram Singh, J)

¶50

saurabh.kr/- U

Shiv Kant Ranjan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Kant Ranjan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fudo Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Kumar Yadav @ Vijay Kumar Ghosh Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar