Disposed¶29

Virendra Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 May 2026CWJC/7118/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

BTSC Staff Nurse recruitment; Advertisement No. 23/2025; Regular Staff Nurse Appointment 2025; final cut off marks; final list for document verification; software error; final answer key; experience weightage marks; writ of mandamus; writ disposed with direction to call petitioners for document verification within four weeks; Patna High Court CWJC No.7118 of 2026; Dr. Anshuman, J.; dated 15-05-2026.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Bihar Technical Service Commission, Bihar, Patna, to call the petitioners for document verification within a period of four weeks. ¶29

Virendra Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7118 of 2026

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Virendra Kumar Yadav S/o- Suresh Chandra Yadav, R/o- At and P.O.Udaichandpur, P.S.- Kerakat, District- Jaunpur (Uttar Pradesh) Pin- 222181, presently posted as Staff Nurse at APHC Gahiri, Block Nautan, DistrictWest Champaran.

¶4

Surendra Singh Karwasra, S/o- Chena Ram Karwasra, R/o- At and P.O.Leeliya, P.S.- Merta City (Jasnager), District- Nagaur, (Rajsthan) Pin341518, presently posted as Staff Nurse at APHC, Mustafapur Kanti.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Chairman, Bihar Technical Service Commission, Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Addl. Secretary, Bihar Technical Service Commission, Bihar, Patna.

¶11

The Examination Controller (Staff Nurse- 2025), Bihar Technical Service Commission, Bihar, Patna.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sita Ram Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha, GA-8 For the BTSC : Mr. Nikesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Bijay Choubey, Advocate

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 15-05-2026

¶16

Learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for the Bihar Technical Service Commission and learned Counsel for the State are present.

¶17

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the

¶18

present writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs:

¶19

“(i) Issuance of a direction, order or writ, including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the concerned respondent authorities under the Health

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.7118 of 2026 dt.15-05-2026 2/3

¶21

Department and Bihar Technical Service Commission, Bihar, Patna to add the petitioners name in the final list published for the document verification in connection with Advertisement No. 23/2025 (Regular Staff Nurse Appointment 2025) because the petitioner have obtained more than final cut off marks fixed by the respondents.

¶22

(ii) Issuance of a direction, order or writ, including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the concerned respondent authority Bihar Technical Service Commission, Bihar, Patna to issue petitioner's final answer key with respect to Advertisement No. 23/2025 (Regular Staff Nurse Appointment 2025) or add the experience marks and call for the documents verification.

¶23

(iii) Issuance of a direction, order or writ, including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the concerned respondent authority, Bihar Technical Service Commission, Bihar, Patna to add the petitioner's experience wattage marks and call for the documents verification and further order to absorb/appoint on the post of Regular Staff Nurse post under the Advertisement No. 23/2025 (Regular Staff Nurse Appointment 2025).

¶24

And for any other appropriate

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.7118 of 2026 dt.15-05-2026 3/3

¶26

relief(s) as per the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶27

Learned Counsel for the Bihar Technical Service

¶28

Commission submits that due to a software error, the petitioners could not be called for document verification. After filing of the writ petition, such defects relating to eight persons have been rectified. He further submits, on instructions received, that all the identified eight persons, namely, Rina Kumari, Virendra Kumar Yadav, Amrita Toppo, Surendra Singh Karwasra, Debasis Ghosh, Valsa Ekka, KM. Vimarsha and Shivangi Gupta, including the present petitioners, shall be called for document verification. In this regard, notices shall be issued to them very shortly.

¶29

In the light of the submissions made by learned counsel for the Bihar Technical Service Commission, the present writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the Bihar Technical Service Commission, Bihar, Patna, to call the petitioners for document verification within a period of four weeks.

¶30

Mkr./Bipin/-

¶31

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶32

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	16.05.2026
Transmission Date

Virendra Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Virendra Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Khushbun Nisa @ Khushnun Nisha Vs The State of Bihar

Mithilesh Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Arati Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sasaram Bhabhua Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The Bihar State Road Transport Corporation Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bimal Kumar Azad @ Vimal Kumar Azad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.