Disposed¶33

Punam Devi @ Poonam Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Mar 2026CWJC/7048/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Vikash Mitra appointment dispute; Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission (BMVM) as appropriate/appellate authority; alternative remedy objection; Collector Vaishali order dated 08.04.2023 in Misc. Case No. 31/2018-19 rejecting claim; earlier remand in CWJC No. 8557 of 2016 by order dated 15.03.2016; writ petition disposed of with liberty to challenge before BMVM within 30 days; Patna High Court; Dr. Anshuman, J.; CWJC No. 7048 of 2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 08.04.2023 passed by the Collector, Vaishali in Misc. Case No. 31/2018-19 before the Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission within 30 days from today. ¶33

Punam Devi @ Poonam Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7048 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Punam Devi @ Poonam Kumari Wife of Rajesh Kumar Choudhary, Resident of Village and P.O. - Madarna, P.S.- Vaishali, District- Vaishali.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar.

¶7

The Collector and District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶8

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶9

The Block Development Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur, District - Vaishali.

¶10

The District Welfare Officer, District Vaishali at Hajipur,

¶11

Block Welfare Officer, Gram Panchayat - Madarna, District- Vaishali.

¶12

Poonam Kumari, Wife of Raju Ram (by caste Chamar) resident of villageBishunpur Paltu, P.S. - Vaishali and District - Vaishali. resident of village and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, BlockVaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶13

Parmeshwar Ram, Son of Musahar Ram, House No. 71, resident of village and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, BlockVaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶14

Raj Kumari Devi, Wife of Bangali Ram, House No. 71, resident of village and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, BlockVaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶15

Sanjay Kumar, Son of - Bangali Ram, House No. 71, resident of village and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, BlockVaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶16

Man Jhariya Devi, Wife of - Parmeshwar Ram, House No. 71, resident of village and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, Block- Vaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶17

Anant Ram, Son of - Parmeshwar Ram, House No. 71, resident of village and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, BlockVaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶18

Sarswati Devi, Wife of Anant Ram, House No. 71, resident of village and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, BlockVaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶19

Vickey Kumar, Son of - Bangali Ram, House No. 71, resident of village and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, BlockVaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶20

Rajesh Ram, Son of- Bangali Ram, House No. 72, resident of village and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, BlockVaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶21

Pappu Kumar, Son of - Bangali Ram, House No. 72, resident of village and Gram Panchayat - Salempur, P.O. - Nandlalpur, P.S. - Lalganj, BlockVaishali, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶22

... ... Respondent/s

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.7048 of 2025(2) dt.16-03-2026 2/3

¶24

=============== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the State	==== : :	=================================== Mr. Mukul Sinha, Advocate Mr. Vipin Kumar Singh, AC to SC 22
For the BMVM	:	Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For the Resp. No. 7 ===============	; ====	Mr. Ram Shankar Prasad, Advocate ===================================

¶25

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶26

2 16-03-2026

¶27

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶28

counsel for the State, learned counsel for the Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission (who was present in Court at the time of hearing) and learned counsel for respondent No. 7.

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 08.04.2023, passed by the Collector, Vaishali, in Misc. Case No. 31/2018-19, has been challenged in this writ petition. Counsel further submits that the matter relates to Vikash Mitra. It is submitted that this is the second round of litigation, as the petitioner had earlier approached this Hon’ble Court in CWJC No. 8557 of 2016, in which, vide order dated 15.03.2016, the matter was remanded to the Collector and District Magistrate, Vaishali, at Hajipur, with a direction that if the issue was still alive, the petitioner’s claim should be decided in accordance with law. Counsel further submits that the petitioner thereafter filed a representation before the Collector and District Magistrate, Vaishali, at Hajipur, who, by order dated 08.04.2023, rejected the petitioner’s claim. The said order

¶30

Patna High Court CWJC No.7048 of 2025(2) dt.16-03-2026 3/3

¶31

of the Collector has been challenged in the present writ petition.

¶32

Learned counsel for the State raised a preliminary objection and submits that the matter relates to the appointment of Vikash Mitra. It is further submitted that in matters concerning the appointment of Vikash Mitra, the appropriate authority is the Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission, and the petitioner has not made the Mission a party for reasons best known to her. Counsel further submits that the said order passed by the District Magistrate is appealable before the Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission at the State level.

¶33

In view of the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order dated 08.04.2023, passed by the Collector, Vaishali, in Misc. Case No. 31/2018-19 before the Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission within 30 days from today.

¶34

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶35

Aman Kumar/-

¶36

Punam Devi @ Poonam Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Punam Devi @ Poonam Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prity Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Tarun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Archna Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Samarjeet Kumar, Vs The State of Bihar

Upendra Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Prabhaker Narain Singh Vs The State of Bihar