Disposed

Pritam Arora v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Jun 2026CWJC/6997/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought direction for disposal of a pending mutation application which was pending before multiple authorities. The Court observed that the petitioner was unsure of the pendency and the competent authority. The writ was disposed of by directing the petitioner to file an application with the appropriate authority for expeditious decision within four months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioner to file application before appropriate authority for decision within four months.

Pritam Arora Vs The State of Bihar — Municipal and Town Planning | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6997 of 2026

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Pritam Arora S/o Lt. Wadhwa Ram, R/o C-1 Saraswati Gardan, P.O- Ramesh Nagar, P.S.- Kirti Nagar, Dist.- New Delhi 110015, A/p residing at L-1/14 Sri Krishna Puri, P.S.- S.K Puri, P.O- G.P.O, Dist- Patna, 800001.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar represented through Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Dept., Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariate Building, Baily Road, Patna.

¶7

The Patna Municipal Corporation, represented through the Patna Municipal Commissioner, Mourya Lok, P.S- Kotwali, Dist.- Patna.

¶8

Patna Municipal Commissioner, Mourya Lok, P.S.- Kotwali, Dist.- Patna.

¶9

Chief Executive Officer, P.M.C, Nutan Rajdhani Anchal Near Income-tax golambar, Patna- 800001.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tilak Sao, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ravish Chandra (AC to Ex-SC-11) For Patna Municipal Corporation : Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Advocate

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 23-06-2026

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶17

counsel for the Patna Municipal Corporation.

¶18

The petitioner has filed the instant application for

¶19

the following reliefs:

¶20

“ (i) For the grant of proper direction to the authority concerned (Resp. No. 3, 4) to dispose of the case vide Vigilance case no. 11/2022 Pritam Arora …. Petitioner Vs Municipal commissioner (P.M.C) and others...... Respondents, which is pending since 2022 before the Resp. No.3 for order, when the matter relates to the mutation in the name of the petitioner over the land/house in question (bearing house No. L-1/14,

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.6997 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/3

¶22

ward No. 12 (old), 21 (New), situated at S.K. Puri, block No. 2 at Shri Krishna Puri, P.S. S.K Puri, Dist.Patna.

¶23

(ii) For the grant of other relief/reliefs to which the petitioner is found entitled to.”

¶24

At the outset, it is pointed out by learned counsel

¶25

for the Patna Municipal Corporation that though the petitioner prays for disposal of his pending case/application for mutation, however from perusal of paragraph nos.10 and 11 of the writ application, it transpires that the petitioner himself is not sure about the pendency of his application and the authority before whom it is pending.

¶26

Paragraph nos.10 and 11 of the writ application is reproduced herein above for ready reference:

¶27

“10. That the petitioner, having being possessed with the said land/house, under the capacity of the legal leasee of the same executed by the real leasee and paying the holding tax of the same. The petitioner has applied for the mutation of said land/house vide case no. 139/2015-16 before the Resp. No. 4 on 23/05/2015, but nothing is done by the Resp. No. 4 as yet.

¶28

11. That having being considered this aspect of the matter, the petitioner has persuaded the matter before the Resp. No. 3 for mutation of his name by filing petition vide vigilance case no. 11/2022 on 22/07/2015 for the said land/house and to issue the holding/revenue tax of the said property in his name,

¶29

Patna High Court CWJC No.6997 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 3/3

¶30

but the matter is still pending. And the Ld. Resp. no. 3, 4 are sitting over the matter un-necessarily causing serious pre-judice and harassment to the petitioner.”

¶31

The writ application is disposed of directing the petitioner to file an application along with a copy of this order before the appropriate authority before whom as per the petitioner, his application is pending and on the same being filed, the authority concerned shall proceed in accordance with law and decide the application of the petitioner expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from the date of its filing.

¶32

It is made clear that the Court has not entered into the merits of the case of the petitioner which is to be decided by the authority concerned.

¶33

The writ application stands disposed of.

¶34

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶35

Saurabh/-

¶36

Pritam Arora v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pritam Arora v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Indrajeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Amrendra Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Rai @ Ramesh Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Sima Devi Vs The State of Bihar