Rajan Kumar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Government Pleader- 6 For Mines Department : Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Spl. P.P. Mines : Ms. Shruti Singh, Advocate ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 18-06-2026 Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the

¶16

petitioner and Mr. Naresh Dikshit, learned Spl. P.P. Mines.

¶17

The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):

¶18

(i) for issuing a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ quashing the illegal seizure of the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No.- BR-06-GA-4281, which has been illegally seized on 12.03.2026 by the respondent.

¶19

(ii) For issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the immediate release

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.5637 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026 2/3

¶21

of the seized vehicle which was seized without following due process of law.

¶22

(iii) For directing an independent enquiry of the illegal and coercive actions of police officials of Govindpur police station, Nawada as well as officials of Mines & Geology Department, Nawada.

¶23

(iv) For grant of any relief/s as petitioner may be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the present case.

¶24

The matter relates to the seizure of truck bearing Registration No. BR-06-GA-4281, seized on 12.03.2026 under the Govindpur Police Station in the District of Nawada on the ground of overloading of coal.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he was moving on valid challan but intercepted and seized. The Truck is getting deteriorated day by day and though he is ready to face the legal battle, in view of the fact that no fine amount has been disclosed, is further unable to make the payment and get the Truck released.

¶26

Learned Special PP for the Mines submit that if the petitioner approaches in the next four weeks, the concerned Officer shall be providing the details and if he is ready to make the payment, the Truck shall be released subject to conditions.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes:

¶28

Patna High Court CWJC No.5637 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026 3/3

¶29

i. not to alienate the truck;

¶30

ii. to produce it as and when required by the respondent authorities.

¶31

In that background, instead of keeping the case pending, the writ petition is disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the District Mining Officer, Nawada along with the order and the concerned Officer shall be duty bound to disclose the fine amount which shall be paid and the truck be released thereafter, subject to be legal formalities that has to be completed by the petitioner with the respondents.

¶32

Since the Truck has been seized, this Court accepts the contention put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner that the family is facing financial crisis and as such, the amount that is to be presented, it be allowed to be paid in three equal installments.

¶33

The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation.

¶34

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶35

Vijay

¶36

Singh/Munindra Kumar Sahu

¶37

U

Rajan Kumar Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajan Kumar Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bablu Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Paswan @ Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bittu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sipahi Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

M/s Vinay Construction Vs The State of Bihar