Disposed

Sathish Kumar Sharma v. The Honble Chancellor of Universities

Patna HC3 Jul 2026CWJC/5573/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a Letters Patent Appeal challenging the appointment of a Vice-Chancellor on statutory grounds. The court held that parallel proceedings before the Governor are not permissible on the same facts and directed the petitioner to approach the Governor first.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is disposed of with an observation that the petitioner must approach the Court only if aggrieved after the matter is determined by the Hon'ble Governor.

Sathish Kumar Sharma Vs The Honble… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5573 of 2026

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sathish Kumar Sharma son of late Vinay Sharma, R/O-village+P.O.-Sadya Bigha, District: Lakhisarai, Bihar and presently residing at B-405, Murlidhar, Valika, IAS Colony, Rupuspur, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Honble Chancellor of Universities, Bihar, Rajbhawan, Patna, through the Principal Secretary, Governor’s Secretariat, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Governor’s Secretariat, Raj Bhawan Patna.

¶8

The State of Bihar, Through its Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Aryabhatta Knowledge University through its Registrar, Mithapur, Patna.

¶10

The Vice-Chancellor, Aryabhatta Knowledge University, Mithapur, Patna.

¶11

Professor Sharad Kumar Yadav, Vice-Chancellor, Aryabhatta Knowledge University (AKU), University Campus, Mithapur, Patna-800001.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

=============== Appearance :	====	===================================
For the Petitioner/s	:	Mr. Shiv Pratap Palak, Advocate
For the Respondent/s	:	Mr. Mohit Agrawal, AC to AG
For the Chancellor	:	Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
For AKU	:	Mr. P.K. Verma, Sr. Advocate
===============	====	Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate Ms. Tooba Hera, Advocate ===================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA

¶15

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶16

Date : 03-07-2026

¶17

The petitioner in the instant Letters Patent Appeal is aggrieved with the appointment of Respondent No. 6

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.5573 of 2026 dt.03-07-2026 2/3

¶19

(Professor Sharad Kumar Yadav) as the Vice-Chancellor of Aryabhatta Knowledge University, Patna. It is alleged in the petition that his appointment is void ab initio as the provisions of Section 2 (27) of the Aryabhatta Knowledge University (Amendment) Act, 2021 have been flouted.

¶20

The petitioner argues that, the appointee’s academic background as a Professor of Veterinary Microbiology falls entirely outside the statutory definition and academic mandate of the specified “Professional Education” disciplines required for the University.

¶21

Heard counsel for the parties. Learned Counsel for the State-respondents have invited the attention of this Court to Annexure-P/6 (collectively) (page-56), wherein a communication has been made by the petitioner vide letter dated 07.07.2025 to the Governor of the State of Bihar, alleging therein that, there has been an abuse of the statutes of the concerned University during the appointment of the Respondent No. 6.

¶22

It is conceded by learned counsel for the petitioner that this grievance was put forth to the Hon’ble Governor of the State and is awaiting redressal.

¶23

In our considered view, there cannot be parallel proceedings one before the Hon’ble Governor and one before this Court on the same set of facts and same cause of action. Hence, in the facts and circumstances of the said matter, we are inclined to dispose of this matter with the observation

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.5573 of 2026 dt.03-07-2026 3/3

¶25

that the petitioner can approach the Court if he still aggrieved after the matter is determined by the Hon’ble Governor as Chancellor of the said University.

¶26

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶27

(Meenakshi Madan Rai, CJ)

¶28

(Soni Shrivastava, J)

¶29

devendra/-

¶30

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE	N/A
Uploading Date	06.07.2026
Transmission Date	N/A

Sathish Kumar Sharma v. The Honble Chancellor of Universities

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sathish Kumar Sharma v. The Honble Chancellor of Universities

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shabana Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Syed Aquil Abbas @ Syed Aquil Abbas Naqvi (Attorney Holder) Vs The State of Bihar

The State of Bihar Vs Krishna Bihari Pandey

Sanjeet Kumar Rai @ Sanjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kamlesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary

The Chairman Vs Surendra Jha