Dismissed¶16

Ranjita Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Jan 2026CWJC/3365/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Non-prosecution dismissal; petitioner absent on consecutive listings (12.01.2026 and 28.01.2026); writ petition involving Central Selection Board of Constable Recruitment (Bihar Police) and State of Bihar; no merits addressed, no statute or precedent engaged.

What did the court decide?

The Court found that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter, since no one appeared on her behalf on 12.01.2026 nor again on the hearing date. ¶14

Ranjita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3365 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ranjita Kumari Daughter of Sri Bhagwati Ram, Wife of Sri Amarjit Rajvanshi, Resident of Village-Ghari, Post-Sohagi, P.S.-Nasriganj, DistrictRohtas (Sasaram)

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home, Govt of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director General of Police-Cum-Chairman, Central Selection Board of Constable Recruitment (Bihar Police), Sardar Patel Bhawan. 6th Floor, Block-A/626, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Government of Bihar, Patna800023.

¶8

The Officer on Special Duty, Central Selection Board of Constable Recruitment (Bihar Police), Sardar Patel Bhawan, 6th Floor, Block-A/626, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Md. Nadim Seraj (GP-5) Mr. AC to GP-5 For the CSBC : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate Mr. Binod Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Vivek Anand Amritesh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 28-01-2026

¶12

No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned Counsel for the State and learned Counsel for Central Selection Board of Constable Recruitment are present.

¶13

It transpires to this Court that on 12.01.2026 also no one was appeared on behalf of the petitioner and matter has been adjourned for today. Today also no one appears.

¶14

In this background, it transpires to this Court that petitioner is not interested to pursue this matter. Hence, this

¶15

Patna High Court CWJC No.3365 of 2022(4) dt.28-01-2026 2/2

¶16

Court has no option but to dismiss this case due to nonprosecution. Accordingly, this application is dismissed for nonprosecution.

¶17

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶18

Mkr./- U

Ranjita Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjita Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Yadav @ Sanjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pinki Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Prasad Choudhary @ Bhola Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Rakhi Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Randhir Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Prasad Malakar Vs The State of Bihar