19.02.2021, for preparation of final merit list for the post of Skilled Supporting Staff against advertisement No. 03 of 2019. The said committee after due deliberation and in accordance with the prescribed rules, guidelines and criteria, prepared the final merit list for the said post. The entire selection process, including preparation of merit list, was carried out in a fair, transparent and lawful manner by the committee, therefore, no illegality or irregularity has been committed by the respondent University at any time. The respondent University duly considered the candidature of the petitioner under both the aforesaid quotas, in accordance with the applicable rules and criteria, governing the selection process. So far as the PWD category is concerned, such candidates were exempted from appearing in the physical test. Instead, their merit was assessed on the basis of academic qualification and written examination. The marking scheme for academic qualification was also fixed which is 0.25 X the high school marks + 10 marks for 10+2 qualification with maximum 25 marks + 3 marks for each completed years of experience, with maximum of 25 marks. The written examination carried 250 marks, marking the total aggregate marks to 300. He further submits that even after considering the candidates under both quotas, certain candidates could not qualify. However, on