Petitioners sought to quash the declaration of their promotion forms as invalid and to be permitted to appear in the promotion examination. The court dismissed the petition in terms of directions in a prior Division Bench judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2983 of 2026
======================================================
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate : Ms. Kumari Anupam, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, AC to AAG-3 : Mr. Piyush Lal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 21-04-2026 Heard the parties.
following reliefs:-
Patna High Court CWJC No.2983 of 2026(2) dt.21-04-2026
2/4
Patna High Court CWJC No.2983 of 2026(2) dt.21-04-2026 3/4
Patna High Court CWJC No.2983 of 2026(2) dt.21-04-2026 4/4
No. 679 of 2016 and its analogues case, which relates to appointment in the Civil Courts in the State of Bihar.
(Ritesh Kumar, J)
AjayMishra/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners' promotion forms were validly declared invalid and whether they could participate in the promotion examination for Upper Division Clerk.
Mukesh Mukul
Bhola Kumar Singh
Md. Zainul Haque Ansari
Birendra Kumar
Basant Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
Ritesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
