Dismissed¶24

Sudhakar Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jan 2026CWJC/249/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Threshold withdrawal of writ petition; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate authority; petitioners Sudhakar Mishra, Mahesh Jha, Govind Mishra versus State of Bihar (HRD Department), District Education Officer/District Programme Officer Madhubani, and Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board (Chairman and Secretary); Patna High Court CWJC No. 249 of 2026 dated 12-01-2026; single judge Alok Kumar Sinha; no statutes, cases, issues or quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate authority for seeking the relief as claimed for in the present writ application. ¶24

Sudhakar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.249 of 2026

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sudhakar Mishra Son of Mahakanta Mishra, Resident of Village- Chanpura, P.S- Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

¶4

Mahesh Jha, Son of Late Chandra Shekhar Jha, Resident of Village- Pole Star, Ramnagar Jagatpur, P.S.- Rahika, District- Madhubani.

¶5

Govind Mishra, Son of late Narendra Mishra, Resident of Village- Haripur Majrahi, P.S.- Kaluani, District- Madhubani.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resource Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Director Secondary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶11

The Deputy Secretary to Government, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶12

The Special Director (Sanskrit), Secondary and Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶13

The District Education Officer, Madhubani, District- Madhubani.

¶14

The District Programme Officer, Establishment Madhubani.

¶15

The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board Back Harding Road, Patna.

¶16

The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board Back Harding Road, Patna.

¶17

... ... Respondent/s

¶18

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Md. Harun Quareshi, SC-1 : AC to SC-1 For BSSB : Mr. Ankit, Advocate : Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA

¶19

ORAL ORDER

¶20

2 12-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned

¶21

counsel for the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board and learned counsel for the Respondent-State.

¶22

After advancing some argument, learned counsel

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.249 of 2026(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/2

¶24

for the petitioners prays for withdrawing the present writ application with liberty to approach the appropriate authority for seeking the relief as claimed for in the present writ application.

¶25

As prayed for, the present writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶26

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

¶27

Gaurav Sinha/-

¶28

Sudhakar Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhakar Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Taufique Ahmed Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dharmendra Kumar Roy Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Surendra Yadav alias Surendr Vs The State of Bihar through the Secretary of Mines and Geology Department

Amrendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Madhu Raushan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramagya Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.