Nagendra Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21024 of 2025

======================================================

Nagendra Tiwari Son of Late Ram Shankar Tiwari, resident of village- Barki Nainijor, Police Station - Nainijor, District- Buxar, presently posted as Hawaldar- 55, Bihar Special Armed Police- 2, Dehri-on-Sone, Police StationDehri-on-Sone, District- Rohtas.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home (Police) Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director General, Bihar Special Armed Police Force, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Deputy Inspector General, Bihar Special Armed Force (Central Division), Patna.

¶10

The Commandant, Bihar Special Armed Police- 2, Dehri-On-Sone, DistrictRohtas.

¶11

... ... Respondents

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent-State: Mr. Additional Advocate General (13)

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 31-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶18

2. The petitioner has filed this writ application for

¶19

following reliefs:-

¶20

“(I) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing upon the Respondents concerned to consider the claim of petitioner for grant of 3rd MACP after completion of 30 years of service w.e.f, 19.12.2018 as well as for promotion on the post of Sub-Inspector w.e.f 19.12.2023 since when similarly situated employees or even juniors to the petitioner have been considered and granted the

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.21024 of 2025(2) dt.31-01-2026 2/3

¶22

promotion on the post of sub-Inspector as well as benefit of 3rd MACP but claim of petitioner is not considered without assigning any valid reason despite the fact that petitioner has represented his claim through proper channel on 26.5.202S addressed to Respondent No.5 which has already been endorsed with all necessary service records and information vide letter No.2650 dated 3.6.2025 addressed to respondent No.4 but till date neither claim of petitioner has been considered nor any communication has been made with the petitioner.

¶23

II. For further direction upon the respondents concerned to pay the due differences of salary accrued after providing the benefit of 3rd MACP as well as regular promotion on the post of S.I, which is due w.e.f. 19.12.2018 and 19.12.2023 respectively.

¶24

III. Any other order/orders for granting any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶25

IV. For grant of any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is legally entitled in1the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.21024 of 2025(2) dt.31-01-2026 3/3

¶27

3. At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that vide Annexure-P/2, the petitioner has filed a detailed representation before the respondent no.5 raising his grievance, who, in turn, has forwarded his representation to the respondent no.3 by Annexure-P/3 vide Letter No. 2650 dated 03.06.2025 for the needful. However, till date no decision has been taken on the representation filed by the petitioner.

¶28

4. In the interest of justice, this Court finds it expedient to direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation annexing his previous representation with a copy to this order before respondent no. 3 within two weeks from today. It is expected that respondent No.3 shall consider all the aspects of the matter and the grounds mentioned in the representation after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, which may be communicated to the petitioner.

¶29

5. This writ application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶30

(Praveen Kumar, J)

¶31

shivam/-

¶32

U

Nagendra Tiwari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagendra Tiwari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Upendra Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Rai Vs State of Bihar

Dinanath Sharma Vs State of Bihar

Ramanuj Sinha @ Ram Anuj Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Ashraf Ali @ Md. Ashraf Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar