Disposed

The Union of India v. Rajeev Parihast

Patna HC24 Feb 2026CWJC/20904/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenged a Central Administrative Tribunal order directing parity relief and interest for a Junior Hindi Translator. Counsel sought liberty to argue on interest accrual dates before the Tribunal via review; the High Court granted liberty and disposed of the petition without adjudicating the issue.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioners to file an appropriate review petition before the learned CAT; writ petition disposed of on those terms.

The Union of India Vs Rajeev Parihast — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20904 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

The Union of India Through The Director General, Ministry Of Ministry Of Statistics and Amp, Programme Implementation, (Field Operations Division), Government Of India, R.K. Puram, New-Delhi-110066.

¶4

The Additional Director General, Ministry Of Ministry Of Statistics Implementation, (Field Programme (Field Operations Division), National Sample Survey Government Of India, R.K. Puram, New-Delhi-110066.

¶5

The Deputy Director General (EZ), National Sample Survey Office, (Field Operations Division), Government Of India, Kolkata-

¶6

The Deputy Director General, Regional Office National Sample Survey Office, (Field Operations Division), Government Of India, Gayatri Mandir Road, Kankarbagh, Patna-800020 (Bihar)

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

Rajeev Parihast Son Of Kula Nand Parihast, Junior Hindi Translator, Office Of The Regional Manager, National Sample Survey, Ministry Of Statistics and Amp, Programme Implementation, Governement Of India, (Field Operations Division), Gayatri Mandir Road, Kankarbagh, Patna-800020 (Bihar).

¶10

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the UOI : Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, Sr. Panel Counsel Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, C.G.C.

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶12

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

¶13

The present writ petition has been filed against the

¶14

4 24-02-2026 The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 08.01.2025 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna (hereinafter

¶15

Patna High Court CWJC No.20904 of 2025(4) dt.24-02-2026 2/3

¶16

referred to as the “learned CAT”) in O.A. No. 050/00206 of 2017 whereby and whereunder the petitioners herein have been directed to accord same relief to the sole respondent herein as has been granted to the applicants of O.A. No. 699 of 2013 by the learned CAT vide order dated 26.05.2015 as also vide order dated 27.01.2017 passed by the learned CAT in O.A. No. 67 of 2017.

¶17

Nonetheless, at the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners herein could not point out before the learned CAT that simple interest @ 8%, in the facts and circumstances of the present case can at best be awarded from the date of passing of the impugned order dated 08.01.2025 and not from the date of passing of the order by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 25.07.2013, inasmuch as the respondent herein was not diligent enough to approach the Court promptly and there has been grave laches on his part resulting in the original application suffering from the vice of delay and laches.

¶18

In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to file appropriate review petition before the learned CAT. Liberty so sought is granted.

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.20904 of 2025(4) dt.24-02-2026 3/3

¶20

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands

¶21

disposed off on the aforesaid terms.

¶22

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶23

( Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶24

Nilmani/-

¶25

The Union of India v. Rajeev Parihast

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Union of India v. Rajeev Parihast

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gautam Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shivnarayan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rajmangal Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Soma Ghosh Vs The Union of India

Chandan Prakash Pandey Vs The Union of India

The Union of India Vs Shreya