Vibha Pandey Vs The B. N. Mandal University, Lalu Nagar and Ors.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2071 of 2018

======================================================

Vibha Pandey W/o Shri Vimal Pandey, Resident of Plot No.- 399, by the side of B.S.N.L Office, Mohalla- Shivdaspur, Manduadih, P.O. P.S.- Manduadih, District- Varanasi U.P..

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The B. N. Mandal University, Lalu Nagar and Ors

¶7

The Vice-Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University Lalu Nagar, Madhepura.

¶8

The Registrar, B.N. Mandal University Lalu Nagar, Madhepura.

¶9

The Bihar Public Sevice Commission, Bailey Road, Patna represented through its Secretary, Bihar Pub

¶10

The Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶11

The Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶12

The Joint Secretary-cum-Examination Controller, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna

¶13

The Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶14

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Education Department Patna.

¶15

Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapeeth, Varanasi, through its Registrar.

¶16

Registrar, Mahatma Gandhi Vidyapeeth, Varanasi, U.P.

¶17

... ... Respondent/s

¶18

================ Appearance :	===	===================================
For the Petitioner/s	:	Mr. Shri Prakash Srivastava, Advocate Mr. Apurva Kumar, Advocate Mr. Santosh Bharti, Advocate
For BPSC	:	Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Prabhark Pahepuri, Advocate
For B.N. Mandal Univ.	:	Ms. Aditi Sharma, Advocate
For MGK Vidyapeeth	:	Mr. Ravish Chandra, Advocate
For UGC	:	Mr. Amalendra Nath Verma, SC to UGC Ms. Surbhi Bhushan, J/C
For the Respondent/s ================	: ===	Smt. Binita Singh-SC28 ===================================
CORAM: HONOUR	ABL	E MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR

¶19

ORAL ORDER

¶20

20 07-07-2026

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶22

The writ petition has been filed for the following

¶23

reliefs:-

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.2071 of 2018(20) dt.07-07-2026

¶25

2/3

¶26

(i) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents No. 2 & 3 to appoint the petitioner as, in contemplation to the Advertisement (Annexure- P/1) made by the Respondent No. 6, the petitioner applied for the post of Assistant Professor and the Respondent No. 6 issued the result of provisionally eligible candidates of Assistant Professor, no appointment letter has been issued to the petitioner though the persons similar to the petitioner namely (1) Ashwani Kumar Jha, (2) Ashish Kumar - II & (3) Kiran Bala were appointed in Magadh University, Gaya and (4) Yasmin Kausar, (5) Vijayshri, (6) Ranjeet Kumar Pandey & (7) Shashikala Kumari were appointed in Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara, but the petitioner has been subjected to hostile discrimination.

¶27

(ii) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents No. 2 & 3 to issue letter of appointment to the petitioner for the post of Assistant Professor in the subject of Psychology, because despite of fulfilling the eligibility criteria, no action is being taken by and at the hand of the Respondents No. 2 & 3 towards issuing letter of appointment to the petitioner.

¶28

(iii) Any other relief or

¶29

reliefs.

¶30

In view of order issued by the registrar as contained

¶31

Patna High Court CWJC No.2071 of 2018(20) dt.07-07-2026 3/3

¶32

in Memo No.700/2023 dated 18.06.2026 whereby the appointment on the post of Assistant Professor in subject of Psychology has already been issued and petitioner is said to have joined the said post, nothing survives in view of the nature of reliefs sought for adjudication in the instant writ petition.

¶33

It is expected that appropriate steps shall be taken by the concerned authorities of the University, by placing the case of the petitioner before the Syndicate in the forthcoming meeting, as stipulated in the appointment letter, for approval and the consequential benefits. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner, along with all consequential benefits, to which the petitioner is entitled. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably within three months from the date of representation.

¶34

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty aforesaid.

¶35

(Ajit Kumar, J)

¶36

rajan/-

¶37

U

Vibha Pandey v. The B. N. Mandal University, Lalu Nagar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vibha Pandey v. The B. N. Mandal University, Lalu Nagar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satrughan Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Dashanand Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Jay Prakash Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Nirmala Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anita Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.