Madan Mohan Prasad v. The Central Provident Fund Commission and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Patna High Court CWJC No.18529 of 2014 (docket dt.12-02-2026); Madan Mohan Prasad (petitioner, Hathidah/Mokama area, Patna) vs Central Provident Fund Commission, Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Bhavishyanidhi Bhawan, Patna) and Bata India Ltd (Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata; Mokama Ghat/Hathidah branch); counsel: Prashant Sinha for respondents, Sumeet Kumar Singh, Deepali Singh, Anmol Kumar, Kumar Vikram for Resp. Nos. 2 to 4; petitioner absent 11.02.2016 and 12.02.2026 despite last-indulgence listing; writ petition dismissed for default and non-prosecution by Justice G. Anupama Chakravarthy; no statutes or precedents cited; suitable only as a procedural-dismissal reference.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed for default and for non-prosecution, the petitioner having failed to secure representation even after the Court's last indulgence.