Akhilesh Kumar v. The Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; permission/withdrawal during argument; liberty reserved to agitate before appropriate forum/authority; Patna High Court; Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17097 of 2023; petitioner Akhilesh Kumar; respondents Union of India (Dept. of Finance and Commerce), Reserve Bank of India (Patna Branch), State of Bihar, Tata Motors Finance Solutions Ltd., Repo Agency (recovery agent); advocate for petitioner Mukesh Kumar Singh; Additional Solicitor General and Dhananjay Kashyap for respondents; Single Judge G. Anupama Chakravarthy; order dated 15-07-2026. Useful only as procedural precedent showing liberty granted on withdrawal; contains no ruling on merits.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to the petitioner to challenge the action of the respondents before the appropriate authority; no substantive relief adjudicated.