Dismissed¶25

Radha Kumari @ Radha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Jan 2026CWJC/1665/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; CWJC No.1665 of 2022; Radha Kumari @ Radha v. State of Bihar; respondents include Principal Secretary HRD, Principal Secretary IT, Secretary General Administration, Secretary Finance, Accountant General, and BELTRON officials; writ petition for mandamus; withdrawn for want of prior representation before the concerned authority; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue remedy; decided by Dr. Anshuman, J. on 05-01-2026; no merits adjudication; useful only for practice point on withdrawal with liberty, not citable for any legal proposition.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal permitted; liberty to take appropriate remedy/step before the concerned authority. ¶25

Radha Kumari @ Radha Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1665 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Radha Kumari @ Radha D/o Devendra Kumar, Resident of Road No. -6-C, Mahadevpuri, and P.S.-Gardanibagh, Distt.-Patna (Bihar) 800001.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Information Technology Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Secretary Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

¶11

The Accountant General, Patna, Bihar.

¶12

The Managing Director, BELTRON, Beltron Bhawan, Shastri Nagar, Patna, Bihar.

¶13

The In-Charge (Human Resource) BELTRON, Beltron Bhawan, Shastri Nagar, Patna, Bihar.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha (GA-7) For the BELTRON : Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Akash Anand, Advocate For the AG : Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Advocate ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶17

3 05-01-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for

¶18

the State, learned counsel for the Accountant General and learned counsel for the BELTRON are present.

¶19

After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been filed for issuance of writ of mandamus, but unfortunately, representation could not be filed before the authority concerned

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.1665 of 2022(3) dt.05-01-2026 2/2

¶21

against whom the petitioner seeks relief. As such, he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to

¶22

take appropriate remedy/step before the concerned authority.

¶23

Permission granted.

¶24

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands

¶25

dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

¶26

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶27

Divyansh/-

¶28

Radha Kumari @ Radha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radha Kumari @ Radha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kamal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kishori Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Nirmala Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Niraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Subodh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar