Disposed¶29

Shanti Devi v. The Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Pvt. Ltd.

Land Acquisition – Compensation

Patna HC7 Apr 2026CWJC/13574/2023

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court (Rajiv Roy, J.), Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13574 of 2023, decided 07-04-2026 - Shanti Devi v. Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. - enhancement of land acquisition compensation (Branch Road/Residential category with interest); land acquired for railway over-bridge; rejection by Arbitrator-cum-Divisional Commissioner, Patna in Rail Arbitration Case No. 23 of 2021; remedy under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; writ petition disposed of with liberty to act in accordance with law - 'missed the bus'.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to act in accordance with law; writ petition disposed of without commenting on merits, no substantive relief granted. ¶29

Shanti Devi Vs The Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation… — Arbitration | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13574 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Shanti Devi Wife of Bal Krishan Singh, Resident of village- Tenduni Tola, Yogi Beer Dumranv Road, Bikramganj, P.S.- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. At present- S-21/B- 367 Indra Kalyan Vihar, Okhla, Phase 1, New Delhi, South Delhi, Delhi- 110020

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Pvt. Ltd. through Chief Project Manager, Mughalsarai, Varanasi

¶7

The Deputy Project Manager, Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Pvt. Ltd., Mughalsarai, Varanasi.

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶9

The Arbitrator cum Commissioner Patna Division, Patna.

¶10

The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶11

The competent Authority cum District land Acquisition officer, DistrictRohtas

¶12

The Circle Officer, Sasaram, District Rohtas.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, Adv. Mrs. Arti Kumari, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Birendra Pd. Singh, AC to SC-19 For resp. nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. Tiwari Shwetketu, Adv. ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶17

ORAL ORDER

¶18

2 07-04-2026

¶19

Heard Mrs. Arti Kumari, learned counsel for the

¶20

petitioner and the State.

¶21

The present application has been preferred:

¶22

for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ or writs, direction or directions to the respondents authorities to consider the case of the petitioner for grant and to pay the award amount of the land of the petitioner, considering the land of the petitioner as Branch Road (Residential) along with interest in accordance with law.

¶23

The petitioner earlier owned a land under Nagar

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.13574 of 2023(2) dt.07-04-2026 2/2

¶25

Parishad- Sasaram which was acquired for railway over-bridge construction. The petitioner is aggrieved by the amount that was paid and accordingly, moved before the Arbitrator.

¶26

It was taken by the Arbitrator-cum-Divisional Commissioner, Patna in Rail Arbitration Case No. 23 of 2021 and recording that an award has been prepared and the payment has been made according to the category there which has been received by the petitioner. In that background, no case is made out, it was rejected (Annexure- 3 to the petition).

¶27

Aggrieved, the present petition.

¶28

The stand of the respondents is/are that against the said order passed by the Arbitrator, the petitioner ought to have moved before the Competent Civil Court under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

¶29

This Court can only record that the petitioner has missed the bus. Without commenting further on the merit of the case and granting liberty to act in accordance with law, now that the payment has already been received by her, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶30

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶31

Vijay Singh/-

¶32

Shanti Devi v. The Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shanti Devi v. The Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Jhunna Kumar Sah @ Jhunna Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Arbind Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Jai Prakash Bhagat @ Jai Prakash Das Vs The state of Bihar

Padmavati Devi Vs The State of Bihar