Disposed¶20

Md. Ehteshamuddin v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Apr 2026CWJC/1315/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; CWJC No.1315 of 2022; Md. Ehteshamuddin v. State of Bihar (Rural Works Department); Partha Sarthy, J.; writ application disposed of as withdrawn; liberty to file representation; pay scale similar to Ramanand Das, Peon; counting of period for A.C.P. and M.A.C.P. benefit; Writ of Mandamus; Order No. 50 dated 16.06.2017; Memo No. 199 dated 16.06.2017; decided 02-04-2026.

What did the court decide?

Application withdrawn; liberty granted to file an appropriate representation before the respondent authorities on (i) grant of pay scale similar to that of Ramanand Das, Peon, and (ii) counting of the petitioner's period for grant of benefit under the A.C.P. and M.A.C.P. schemes. ¶20

Md. Ehteshamuddin Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1315 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Md. Ehteshamuddin son of Late Nazamuddin, resident of Village-Kolhua, P.S.-Madhaur, District-Nalanda.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Chief Engineer-4, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Superintending Engineer, Advance Planning Circle, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Nath Pathak, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Alok, S.C.-7 ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 02-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

counsel for the respondents.

¶14

The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following relief(s):

¶15

“That by this application, the Petitioner is invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court in the nature of Writ of Mandamus for directing the Respondents to give benefit w.e.f. the date of promotion of Ramanand Das in view of Order No. 50 dated 16.06.2017 issued under Memo No. 199 dated 16.06.2017 by the Superintending Engineer, Advance Planning Circle, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna.”

¶16

Having argued for sometime and having heard the

¶17

observation of this Court, learned counsel for the petitioner

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.1315 of 2022(4) dt.02-04-2026 2/2

¶19

submits that he be permitted to withdraw the instant application with liberty to raise the points with respect to grant of pay scale similar to that of Ramanand Das, Peon as also with respect to counting of the period for grant of benefit under the A.C.P. and M.A.C.P. schemes to the petitioner by filing appropriate representation before the respondent authorities.

¶20

The writ application is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶21

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶22

Saurabh/-

¶23

Md. Ehteshamuddin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Ehteshamuddin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikki Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Afsar Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Sushil Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Mithlesh Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Baiju Kumar Bharti Vs The State of Bihar