Disposed¶24

Saryu Prasad Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Service matter – Third MACP

Patna HC29 Jan 2026CWJC/1170/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Third MACP; Modified ACP Scheme 2010; PB-3 Grade Pay 6600; Finance Department Government of Bihar notification dated 14.07.2010; District Education Officer Patna; representations dated 26.03.2025 and 26.05.2025; Annexures-P-2 and P-3; writ disposed with direction to consider claim within ten weeks; consequential monetary benefit; State of Bihar Ministry of HRD; Patna High Court CWJC No.1170 of 2026; decision date 29-01-2026; Justice Harish Kumar.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no.2 (District Education Officer, Patna) to consider the petitioner's claim for third MACP as raised in representations (Annexures-P-2 and P-3), preferably within ten weeks from receipt/production of a copy of the order; consequential monetary benefit to be accorded if the claim finds favour. ¶24

Saryu Prasad Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1170 of 2026

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Saryu Prasad Chaudhary S/o Goha Chaudhury, Resident of Village and PostKansari, Thana- Gaurichak, Distt- Patna, 804451.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Ministry of HRD, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna, Bihar 800001.

¶7

The District Education Officer, Patna, Bihar 800001.

¶8

... ... Respondent/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prashant Pratap, GP-2 Mr. Ajit Kumar Jha, AC to GP-2 ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 29-01-2026 Heard the parties.

¶12

The instant writ petition has been filed for the

¶13

following reliefs:-

¶14

“i. Direct the Respondents to grant third MACP as requested to grant the benefit of third MACP from 01.01.2009 in PB 3 Grade Pay 6600 as per the department lay down and Notification ३ए-2वे-पु.-18/2009-7566 ददनांक 14.07.2010 of Modified ACP Scheme 2010, Finance Department, Government of Bihar.

¶15

ii. Direct Respondent to review and reassess the irregularities adopted in the grant of second and third MACP and correct the same. iii. Certify and transmit the entire records and papers pertaining to the applicant's case so that after causes shown there of considerable justice

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.1170 of 2026(3) dt.29-01-2026 2/3

¶17

may be done unto the applicant by way of grant of reliefs as prayed for in (i) and (ii) above. iv. Any further order/orders and/or direction or directions as to your Lordships may deem fit and proper.”

¶18

Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that despite the fact the petitioner is entitled to get the benefit of 3^rd MACP w.e.f. 01.01.2009 in PB 3 Grade Pay 6600/- in terms with the notification issued by the Government as also the Modified ACP scheme 2010, he has not been extended such monetary benefits compelling him to approach this Court. For redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has also approached before the District Education Officer, Patna by filing a detailed representation on 26.03.2025 and further on 26.05.2025, the copies of which have been duly received by the office of the concerned respondent, but till date no decision has been taken.

¶19

Learned Advocate for the State fairly submitted that the petitioner has already approached before the competent authority who shall consider his claim and pass an appropriate order.

¶20

Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the fact that the representation of the petitioner for extending the benefit of 3^rd MACP is pending consideration before the

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.1170 of 2026(3) dt.29-01-2026 3/3

¶22

District Education Officer, Patna, the present writ petition stands disposed off with a direction to the respondent no.2 to consider the claim of the petitioner as raised in his representation (Annexures-P-2 and P-3), preferably within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶23

Suffice it to observe that in case the claim of the petitioner finds favor, necessary consequential monetary benefit must be accorded to him, in accordance with law.

¶24

This disposes the writ petition.

¶25

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶26

rohit/-

¶27

Saryu Prasad Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saryu Prasad Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tuntun Tanti @ Tuntun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sima Devi @ Sima Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Malik Yadav @ Himashu Yadav @ Mallik Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rishu Verma Vs The Union of India

Ranjeet Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ghanshyam Mahto Vs The State of Bihar