Dismissed¶¶25

Upendra Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar

Writ Petition – Dismissal as Infructuous

Patna HC13 May 2026CWJC/11278/2022

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; CWJC No. 11278 of 2022; Upendra Prasad Singh, Kanak Devi, Sunil Kumar, Sushila Kumari, Sulochana Devi v. State of Bihar (HRD Department, Director Primary Education, Regional Deputy Director of Education Patna Division, DEO Nalanda, District Programme Officer (est)); Ritesh Kumar, J.; decided 13-05-2026; salary grievance redressed; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; oral order.

What did the court decide?

Since the petitioners' grievances had already been redressed and they had started getting their salary, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. ¶¶25

Upendra Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11278 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Upendra Prasad Singh son of Late Brahamdev Singh resident of village - Muzaffarpur, P.S. - Nalanda, District - Nalanda.

¶4

Kanak Devi wife of Late Baldev Singh resident of village- Fajullapur, P.S. - Barbigha, District - Nalanda.

¶5

Sunil Kumar son of Late Dukhi Mahto , resident of village - Gulabchak, P.S. - Hilsa, District - Nalanda.

¶6

Sushila Kumari wife of late Kritnandan Prasad, resident of village - Tini Lodipur, P.S. - Chandi, District - Nalanda.

¶7

Sulochana Devi wife of Late Rajendra Pandey, resident of village - Malawan, P.S. - Hilsa, Distrit - Nalanda.

¶8

... ... Petitioner/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶11

The Additional Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶12

The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶13

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna.

¶14

The District Education Officer, Nalanda.

¶15

The District Programme Officer (est), Nalanda.

¶16

... ... Respondent/s

¶17

======================================================

¶18

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Madan Jeet Kumar, GP- 20 ======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶20

11 13-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶21

At the outset, the learned counsel appearing on

¶22

behalf of the petitioners submits that the grievances raised in the present writ petition have already been redressed, since the petitioners have started getting their salary.

¶23

In view of the aforesaid submissions, the writ

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.11278 of 2022(11) dt.13-05-2026 2/2

¶25

petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶26

(Ritesh Kumar, J)

¶27

vinita/-

¶28

Upendra Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Upendra Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akhileshwar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Kumari Ranjana Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rameshwar Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajeev Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Tinku Kumar Vs The State of Bihar