Jwala Prasad v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
MACP; Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme; second MACP; third MACP; retiral dues; parity; similarly situated persons; detailed representation; four weeks; competent authority; appropriate Committee; three months; Screening Committee; Accountant General Bihar; Education Department Bihar; Director of Secondary Education; District Superintendent of Education Rohtas; history teacher; Baulia High School; Rohtas; Sasaram; Supaul; CWJC 10605 of 2026; writ disposed of with representation-and-decision directions instead of substantive adjudication of entitlement; no statute or precedent cited; single-judge bench (Ajit Kumar J).
What did the court decide?
No immediate monetary relief ordered. The writ petition was disposed of with directions: the petitioner to file a detailed representation within four weeks with all necessary documents and particulars of similarly situated persons for parity; and, if such details are pressed, the person competent in law to take a necessary decision within three months of the matter being placed before the appropriate Committee entrusted with the MACP scheme.