Disposed¶27

Naresh Tanti @ Naresh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Jan 2026CR. WJC/522/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Naresh Tanti @ Naresh Kumar v. State of Bihar & others; CR. WJC No.522 of 2022; Patna High Court; Arun Kumar Jha, J; order dated 13-01-2026; S. 145 Cr.P.C.; Case No. 468(M)/1994; SDM Gogri letter D.B No. 318 dt. 31.03.22; order dated 19.01.2018 in Cr.W.J.C. No. 702 of 2016; maintainability of writ petition; execution/compliance of Co-ordinate Bench order; vacation of disputed land; Khagaria; Pasraha; Gogri; disposal without relief.

What did the court decide?

The present writ petition is misconceived and not maintainable, having been filed to stop the execution of the order dated 19.01.2018 of the Co-ordinate Bench. ¶25

Naresh Tanti @ Naresh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.522 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Naresh Tanti @ Naresh Kumar Son of Late Anandi Tanti Resident of Village - Mahaddipur, P.s.- Pasraha, Distt.- Khagaria.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Distt. Magistrate, Khagaria. Bihar

¶9

Sub divisional magistrate , Gogri, Distt. Khagaria. Bihar

¶10

Anchal Adhkari Parbatta, Sub Division Gogri, Distt. Khagaria. Bihar

¶11

Officer in charge, Pasraha, P.s.- Pasraha, Distt. Khagaria. Bihar

¶12

Amar Kumar Sinha Son of Late Kameshwar Prasad Sinha Resident of Village - Laxmi Nagar, P.O. and P.S.- Gogri, Distt.- Khagaria.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arun Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sajid Salim Khan, Adv.

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶17

4 13-01-2026 The present criminal writ petition has been filed

¶18

seeking following relief(s):

¶19

“(i) To quash the Letter bearing D.B No. 318 dt. 31.03.22 in Case No. 468(M)/ 1994 U/s 145 Cr.P.C. issued under the signature of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Gogri to vacate the disputed land on the basis of an order dt. 19.01.18 passed by the Hon’ble Court in Cr.W.J.C. No. 702/ 16 and to restrain the state/respondents from vacating the land under dispute till disposal of this application as in the land possess by the petitioner his pucca residential house in which the petitioner with their family member are living.

¶20

(ii) To pass any such other order or orders

¶21

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.522 of 2022(4) dt.13-01-2026 2/3

¶22

as this Hon’ble Court thinks fit & proper under the facts & circumstances of this case.”

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the light of orders of this Court dated 19.01.2018 passed in Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 702 of 2016, the petitioner has vacated the land in question. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner of Cr.WJC No. 702 of 2016 has now sold out the land in favour of the petitioner.

¶24

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents-State submits that the present writ petition is completely misconceived as in order to circumvent the order dated 19.01.2018 passed in Cr.WJC No. 702 of 2016, the present writ petition has been filed. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gogri proceeded in the matter towards compliance of aforesaid order of this Court dated 19.01.2018 and the petitioner, in order to frustrate the claim of the petitioner of Cr.W.J.C. 702 of 2016, filed the present petition.

¶25

Apparently, the present writ petition has been filed under misconceived notion and to stop the execution of the order dated 19.01.2018 of the Co-ordinate Bench and hence, it is not maintainable. Moreover, as the learned counsel for the petitioner admitted that the petitioner has already vacated the

¶26

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.522 of 2022(4) dt.13-01-2026 3/3

¶27

land in question and the orders of the learned Co-ordinate Bench dated 19.01.2018 passed in Cr.W.J.C. No. 702 of 2016 also stands complied, nothing remains in the present matter and the same is disposed of as such.

¶28

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶29

Anuradha/-

¶30

U T

Naresh Tanti @ Naresh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Tanti @ Naresh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiva Narayan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

Shyam Ranjan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Chandra Jha Vs The State of Bihar, through the District magistrate Muzaffarpur Bihar.

Rakesh Kumar @ Chhotu @ Rajesh Kumar Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Sidhu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna