Disposed¶26

Chandramani Nath Mishra v. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary (Home Police Deptt.), Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

Patna HC14 Jul 2026CR. WJC/1177/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1177 of 2026, decided 14-07-2026 (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad & Sunil Dutta Mishra, JJ.): habeas corpus writ application by Chandramani Nath Mishra v. State of Bihar, State of Rajasthan, police authorities (Madhubani; Kotputli-Behror) and private respondents disposed of as infructuous after parties reached arrangement/settlement in Guardianship Case No.12 of 2024; petitioner alleged compromise signed under wrong impression; Court declined to enter into the issues; liberty reserved to pursue remedies in accordance with law.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to seek his remedy in accordance with law. ¶26

Chandramani Nath Mishra Vs The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary (Home Police Deptt.), Govt. of Bihar, Patna. — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1177 of 2026

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Chandramani Nath Mishra Son of Shambhu Nath Mishra Resident of VillageSukki, P.S.- Khajauli, District- Madhubani, Mobile- 9892174910.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary (Home Police Deptt.), Govt. of Bihar, Patna. Bihar, Patna.

¶7

Senior Superintendent of Police, Madhubani, Bihar Bihar

¶8

Police Station, Madhepur, District- Madhubani, Bihar Bihar

¶9

The State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur Rajasthan, Jaipur

¶10

Senior Superintendent of Police, Kotputli behrod, Rajsthan Rajsthan.

¶11

Police Station Behrod, District- kotputli behrod, Rajsthan. Rajsthan.

¶12

Prity Chandramani Mishra Son of Kamalkant Jha Permanent Resident of Village- Mahisham, P.S.- Madhepur, District- Madhubani (Bihar), Current Resident of Room No. 001, Ground Floor, EWS-06, Tulsi Upvan Society, NH- 8, P.S.- Behror, District- Kotputli, State- Rajasthan, Pin- 301701.

¶13

Pratyush Mishra Son of Chandramani Nath Mishra Permanent Resident of Village- Mahisham, P.S.- Madhepur, District- Madhubani (Bihar), Current Resident of Room No. 001, Ground Floor, EWS-06, Tulsi Upvan Society, NH- 8, P.S.- Behror, District- Kotputli, State- Rajasthan, Pin- 301701.

¶14

Ishita Mishra Son of Chandramani Nath Mishra Permanent Resident of Village- Mahisham, P.S.- Madhepur, District- Madhubani (Bihar), Current Resident of Room No. 001, Ground Floor, EWS-06, Tulsi Upvan Society, NH- 8, P.S.- Behror, District- Kotputli, State- Rajasthan, Pin- 301701.

¶15

Rita Devi Daughter of Visambhar Jha Permanent Resident of VillageMahisham, P.S.- Madhepur, District- Madhubani (Bihar), Current Resident of Room No. 001, Ground Floor, EWS-06, Tulsi Upvan Society, NH- 8, P.S.- Behror, District- Kotputli, State- Rajasthan, Pin- 301701.

¶16

Manohar Kumar Son of Kamalkant Jha Permanent Resident of VillageMahisham, P.S.- Madhepur, District- Madhubani (Bihar), Current Resident of Room No. 001, Ground Floor, EWS-06, Tulsi Upvan Society, NH- 8, P.S.- Behror, District- Kotputli, State- Rajasthan, Pin- 301701.

¶17

Vikas Yadav Unknown Permanent Resident of Village- Mahisham, P.S.Madhepur, District- Madhubani (Bihar), Current Resident of Room No. 001, Ground Floor, EWS-06, Tulsi Upvan Society, NH- 8, P.S.- Behror, DistrictKotputli, State- Rajasthan, Pin- 301701.

¶18

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandramani Nath Mishra (In Person) For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D. Sanjay, A.G. Mrs. Priya Gupta, AC to AG. ======================================================

¶19

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1177 of 2026(3) dt.14-07-2026 2/2

¶20

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶21

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)

¶22

3 14-07-2026

¶23

It appears that in the Guardianship Case No.12 of 2024, the parties have reached to some sort of arrangement/ settlement.

¶24

The petitioner appears in person and submits that he was made to sign on the compromise by giving a wrong impression and understanding of terms.

¶25

This is a writ application seeking writ in the nature of habeas corpus . This Court cannot go into such issues which are being raised by the petitioner.

¶26

This writ application stands disposed of as having become infructuous.

¶27

The petitioner is at liberty to seek his remedy in accordance with law.

¶28

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶29

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)

¶30

utkarsh/-ritik/-

¶31

U T

Chandramani Nath Mishra v. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary (Home Police Deptt.), Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandramani Nath Mishra v. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary (Home Police Deptt.), Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Kumar Gupta @ Dharmendra Krantikari Vs The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar

Ankit Kumar @ Chotu Vs The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Home Deptt., Govt. of Bihar

Shankar Yadav Vs The Union of India through the Intelligence Officer, Narcotices Control Bureau

Laltu Yadav @ Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Kumar Yadav @ Surendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar

Reyaz Moarif @ Bablu Vs The Union of India through Ministry of Home Affairs