Musharaf Reza v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail petition dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared on repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9536 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2018 Thana- WARISNAGAR District- Samastipur
======================================================
Musharaf Reza S/o Md. Rizwan Residents of Village- Rampur, P.O and P.S.Warisnagar, District- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Nirmal Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER
2 27-07-2026
None appeared on behalf of the petitioner on
repeated calls when the matter was taken on record.
in prosecution.
want of prosecution.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
Aniket/-
U T
Musharaf Reza S/o Md. Rizwan
The State of Bihar
Chandra Shekhar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court