Subodh Yadav @ Sanjeev Yadav @ Sanjiv Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91801 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2024 Thana- NAYAGAON District- Begusarai

======================================================

Subodh Yadav @ Sanjeev Yadav @ Sanjiv Yadav S/o Rajendra Yadav Resident of Village- Dariyapur, Ward No. 7, P.S.- Nayagaon, DistrictBegusarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vinod Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Zainul Abedin, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 20-01-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 83 of 2024, instituted for the offences under Sections191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109, 117(2)303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶15

Prosecution case, in short, is that accused persons named in the F.I.R., including the petitioner, have assaulted the informant and one Krishna Kumar with Farsa, iron rods and Lathi-Danda causing serious injuries to them. It has further been alleged that all the accused persons treating the informant dead threw him in the water.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91801 of 2025(2) dt.20-01-2026 2/3

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that other co-accused has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.10.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38784 of 2025. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 11.08.2025 and has one criminal antecedent.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 83 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

¶22

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

¶23

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91801 of 2025(2) dt.20-01-2026 3/3

¶25

fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶26

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶27

manish/-

¶28

U T

Subodh Yadav @ Sanjeev Yadav @ Sanjiv Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subodh Yadav @ Sanjeev Yadav @ Sanjiv Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naresh Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Yogendra Yadav @ Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Gunjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anwar Abbasi Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh mahto Vs The State of Bihar