Dismissed¶15

Bashishth Thakur @ Heera Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Mar 2026CR. MISC./91110/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.91110 of 2025, decided 18-03-2026 by Sandeep Kumar, J. Bashishth Thakur @ Heera Thakur v. The State of Bihar. Anticipatory bail application rejected; apprehended arrest in Kundwachainpur P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025, East Champaran, under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 329(4), 352, 3(5) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; alleged assault causing grievous injury; petitioner directed to surrender within two weeks and seek regular bail, failing which SP East Champaran, Motihari to arrest; counsel: Girish Chandra Jha for petitioner, Sangeeta Sharma for State.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail refused: considering the nature and gravity of the offence, the Court declined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. ¶15

Bashishth Thakur @ Heera Thakur Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91110 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2025 Thana- KUNDWACHAINPUR District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bashishth Thakur @ Heera Thakur S/O Late Ram Chandra Thakur @ Ramchandra Thakur R/O Vill.- Telharakala, P.s.-Kundwachainpur, Dist.- East Champaran

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Patna

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Girish Chandra Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Sangeeta Sharma ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 18-03-2026

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶12

learned counsel for the State.

¶13

2 . The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Kundwachainpur P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025 registered for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 329(4), 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶14

3 . As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the victim causing grievous injury.

¶15

4 . Considering the nature and the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the present case.

¶16

5 . Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is

¶17

hereby rejected.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91110 of 2025(4) dt.18-03-2026 2/2

¶19

The petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below within a period of two weeks from today and seek regular bail, failing which the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran, Motihari will take all steps for the arrest of the petitioner.

¶20

7 . It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the proceedings.

¶21

8 . Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran, Motihari through FAX for its compliance forthwith.

¶22

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶23

Shishir/-

¶24

Bashishth Thakur @ Heera Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bashishth Thakur @ Heera Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mithilesh Paswan @ Mithilesh Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ramawati Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Amrit Mahto @ Chhotu Mahto @ Amrit Kumar Anand Vs The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Deptt.

Chhotu Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar @ Chhotu Vs The State Of Bihar

Gayatri Kumari Vs The State of Bihar