Allowed

Sanjay Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jan 2026CR. MISC./90829/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought correction of a typographical error in a prior bail order naming the wrong special excise court. The High Court allowed modification, substituting Gopalganj court for Siwan, and extended the time to furnish bail bonds by four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 24.09.2025 modified to read 'Additional District and Sessions Judge-IV-cum-Special Excise Court No.-II, Gopalganj'; bail bond furnishing period extended four weeks.

Sanjay Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90829 of 2025

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64710 of 2025

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Gopalganj

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Sanjay Sah S/O Gafur Sah Resident of Village - Purkhas, Bodh Chhapar, P.S.Kuchaikote, District - Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 16-01-2026

¶15

Learned Advocate for the respective parties are

¶16

present.

¶17

The instant application has been filed seeking modification of the order dated 24.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.64710 of 2025 in connection with Excise P.S. Case No.114 of 2025, to the extent whereby on account of typographical mistake in the prayer portion, it has been wrongly mentioned to the satisfaction of “learned Exclusive Special Judge Court No.II, Siwan” in place of “learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-IV-cum-Special Excise Court No.-II, Gopalganj”.

¶18

Learned Advocate for the petitioner fairly submitted that on account of typographical mistake on the part of the petitioner, similar mistake has been occurred in the order

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90829 of 2025(2) dt.16-01-2026 2/2

¶20

dated 24.09.2025.

¶21

In view of the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the petitioner, the modification application stands allowed.

¶22

The order dated 24.09.2025 is modified to the extent that to the satisfaction of “learned Exclusive Special Judge Court No.-II, Siwan” it shall be read as “learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-IV-cum-Special Excise Court No.-II, Gopalganj”.

¶23

The period for furnishing bail bond is extended for a further period of four weeks from today.

¶24

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶25

rohit/-

¶26

U T

Sanjay Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajeet Kumar @ Ajit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Sharma @ Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Lalit Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Priti Kumari Vs Ayush Kumar

Shivani Vs Anant Kumar Anand