Anticipatory bail sought by a person named in an FIR under Arms Act sections after seizure of materials indicating manufacture of arms at a factory in Patna; his name surfaced in a co-accused's statement and he had prior criminal cases, though acquitted once. Considering the seriousness of allegations, the court rejected the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90620 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-590 Year-2025 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna
======================================================
Hare Ram Singh Son of Ram Pravesh Singh Resident of Village - Sadahpura, P.S. - Gaurichak, District - Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rohit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
2 15-01-2026
Heard Mr. Rohit Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90620 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/2
nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession and the name has come in the confessional statement of Gautam Kumar.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in an Arms Act case involving discovery of an alleged gun factory.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Hare Ram Singh
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
