Md. Allauddin @ Gulab Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagandeo Yadav Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh For the O.P. No. 02 : Ms. Minakshi Kumari Mr. Munish Kumar Mr. Munna Raj ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

6 18-06-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

¶12

2 . The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025 for the alleged offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the DP Act.

¶13

3 . As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and others are accused of assaulting and torturing the victim for demand of dowry.

¶14

4 . It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90369 of 2025(6) dt.18-06-2026 2/3

¶16

implicated in this case.

¶17

5 . Learned APP for the State has opposed the application of the petitioner.

¶18

6 . Considering the submission of the parties and in light of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 , this application for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed.

¶19

7 . Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS and with further condition that:

¶20

(I). The petitioner is directed to pay a maintenance amount of Rs. 10000/- from the month of June 2026 to the complainant/informant. The maintenance for the month of June 2026 shall be paid to the complainant/informant within ten days from today, and thereafter, the maintenance amount shall be paid to the complainant/informant

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90369 of 2025(6) dt.18-06-2026 3/3

¶22

every month before the 10^th day of each month. 8 . It is made clear that the order of maintenance passed by this Court shall be subject to the outcome of the maintenance case in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court concerned, if any.

¶23

9 . Needless to state that, if the petitioner fails to abide by the terms and conditions, as stated hereinabove, the State shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application, before the learned concerned Court below for cancellation of bail granted to the petitioner.

¶24

10 . Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Madhubani through FAX for its compliance forthwith.

¶25

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶26

Vikas/-

¶27

U

Md. Allauddin @ Gulab v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Allauddin @ Gulab v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Azmal Ansari @ Azmal Husain Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Nirala Vs The State of Bihar

Anish Kumar @ Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prakash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Niyasz Ahmad @ Niyaz Ahamad @ Md. Niyaz Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar