Anshu Kumar @ Aman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 30-01-2026

¶12

Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, learned counsel for

¶13

the petitioner and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned APP for the State.

¶14

Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 05.08.2025, in connection with Bypass P.S. Case No. 392 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 30.07.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.

¶15

The F.I.R. of the occurrence of loot is against

¶16

unknown.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused person. Although

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88130 of 2025(3) dt.30-01-2026 2/3

¶19

some articles have been recovered from the house of the petitioner but there is non-compliance of Section 100(4) of the Cr. P.C./103 of B.N.S.S.., 2023 and till date no TIP was conducted by the prosecution. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused person namely Chandra Shekhar Kumar Azad has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.01.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 86622 of 2025 and the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 05.08.2025.

¶20

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the looted articles have been recovered from the house of the petitioner and apart from aforesaid the petitioner carries one more case other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matter.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R and the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused person and similarly situated co-accused person has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88130 of 2025(3) dt.30-01-2026 3/3

¶23

two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Patna City, Patna in connection with Bypass P.S. Case No. 392 of 2025, subject to the following conditions :-

¶24

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶25

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶26

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶27

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶28

Ibrar//-

¶29

U T

Anshu Kumar @ Aman Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anshu Kumar @ Aman Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satyam Yadav @ Satyam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar @ Saroj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Samauti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Nandan Yadav@ Chutra Vs The State of Bihar

Sujit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar