Allowed

Anil Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jan 2026CR. MISC./88012/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought in a case alleging house trespass and assault by multiple accused. Court found no need for custodial interrogation and directed release on bail upon surrender within six weeks, with conditions under Section 482 BNSS.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail: petitioner to be released on bail on surrender within six weeks on Rs.10,000 bond with two like sureties, subject to Section 482 BNSS conditions.

Anil Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88012 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2025 Thana- SURYAPURA District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Anil Kumar Ram S/O Baban Ram @ Baban Paswan Resident of VillageMonhar, Police Station- Suryapura, District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr.Narsingh Tanti, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 15-01-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Suryapura P.S. Case No. 128 of 2025 instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 333, 303(2), 308(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, the informant has alleged that the accused persons including the petitioner had come to the house of the informant and without any rhyme or reason, broke the gate of his house and started abusing him. When the informant came out, all the accused persons badly assaulted and alleged air firing was done.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88012 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/2

¶18

case. There is no overt act against the petitioner.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel

¶20

for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas/ concerned Court in connection with Suryapura P.S. Case No. 128 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 of the BNSS/ 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

¶22

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶23

P. Kumar

¶24

U T

Anil Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jawahar Lal Bhardwaj and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Nirmala Devi @ Nirmala Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar

Prabhakar Swami and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Anil Mishra @ Anil Kumar Mishra @ Anil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Karu Raut @ Karu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Paswan Vs The State of Bihar