Allowed

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jan 2026CR. MISC./87962/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous order, Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey granted regular bail to the petitioner in a snatching case under BNS Sections 310(2) and 126(2), directing release upon furnishing a bond with two sureties, noting lack of physical evidence against him despite co-accused confessions.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87962 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-261 Year-2025 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Yadav S/O Rambalak Singh @ Ramvalak Singh R/O Village- Deo Markende, P.S- Karakat, Distt.- Rohtas (Bihar).

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aman Vishal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 12-01-2026

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

APP for the State.

¶12

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 310(2) and 126(2) of the BNS.

¶13

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that three unknown miscreants on a bike being armed with pistol snatched the bag containing Aadhar card, Driving license, mobile phone and Rs.5,000/- on gun-point.

¶14

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during course of investigation several accused persons were apprehended, namely, Shubham Pathak, Anuj Pathak, Bhulan Kumar, Vivek Kumar, Ramesh Yadav, Jitendra Kumar and Mithilesh Kumar Singh. They have given their confessional statement. They have named this petitioner. Learned counsel for

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87962 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/3

¶16

the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has also given his confessional statement. Learned counsel further submits that as far as recovery is concerned, a bike was recovered from one Jitendra Kumar and mobile was recovered from Bhulan Kumar. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. It has also been submitted that save and except the confessional statement of co-accused and that of petitioner, there is nothing against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that similarly situated coaccused, namely, Vivek Kumar has been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 72290 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Learned counsel for the petitioner has lastly submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 25.08.2025.

¶17

5. Learned Additional Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner and has submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of six cases.

¶18

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 261 of 2025 on

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87962 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 3/3

¶20

furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad.

¶21

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶22

durgesh/- U T

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vipul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Kumar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Shaiuddin @ Sayoddin @ Shankar Singh @ Rahul Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Yadav @ Rakesh Kumar Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Nandu Kumar @ Nandu Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Vivek Kumar @ Vishesh kumar Vs The State of Bihar