Dismissed¶¶16

Amir Khan @ Md. Amir v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jan 2026CR. MISC./87510/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Repeat/second bail application rejected for want of new grounds; prolonged custody since 13.05.2025 with stalled trial after charge-framing on 01.11.2025; earlier rejection dated 11.09.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 46273 of 2025; Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87510 of 2025; PS Case 136/2024, Chandradip, Jamui; directions for expeditious conclusion of trial and for SP Jamui to ensure witness production on pain of personal appearance before the Court.

What did the court decide?

No fresh ground exists for reconsideration of the prayer for bail; the petitioner's second bail prayer is rejected. ¶¶16

Amir Khan @ Md. Amir Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87510 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2024 Thana- CHANDRADIP District- Jamui

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Amir Khan @ Md. Amir S/O Sajjad Khan R/O Village- Dinnagar, P.S - Chandradeep, District - Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 16-01-2026

¶12

This is the second attempt of the petitioner to seeks bail from this Court. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected vide order dated 11.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46273 of 2025.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2025 and there has been no progress in trial after framing of charge on 01.11.2025. Learned counsel further submits that there was no intention to cause death and in a free fight between two groups, the father of the informant died. The petitioner is having clean antecedent.

¶14

Learned APP opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned APP submits that there is no new ground for consideration of prayer for bail as the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected recently on 11.09.2025.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87510 of 2025(3) dt.16-01-2026 2/2

¶16

Having regard to the submission of the parties and perusal of record, I do not find any fresh ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the petitioner and hence, his prayer for bail is rejected.

¶17

The learned trial court is directed to take up the matter on urgent basis and conclude the trial at the earliest.

¶18

The Superintendent of Police, Jamui is directed to ensure the production of the witnesses on each and every date fixed by the court concerned. In case of failure, the Superintendent of Police would be required to appear before this Court and explain his conduct.

¶19

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶20

DKS/-

¶21

U T

Amir Khan @ Md. Amir v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amir Khan @ Md. Amir v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jyoti Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Manjesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Minta Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Prasad Yadav Vs The State of Bihar through Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

Rajeev Kumar @ Sadashiv @ Sadashiv Kumar Vs Pratima Kumari