Allowed

Shibu Yadav @ Shivshankar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Jan 2026CR. MISC./87320/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application by a named accused in an assault and disrobing FIR, said to be a counter blast to another case. Noting simple injuries and cross-cases, the court granted anticipatory bail with standard conditions including verification of criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing Rs.10,000 bond with two like sureties within thirty days, subject to conditions under S.438(2) CrPC/S.482(2) BNSS.

Shibu Yadav @ Shivshankar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87320 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2025 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shibu Yadav @ Shivshankar Yadav Son of Late Iner Yadav R/o Village - Dharhara, Ward no. 12, P.S. - Raghopur,Distt. Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal, APP

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 08-01-2026

¶13

Heard Mr.Ranjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No.132 of 2025, dated 09.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 127(2), 110, 76, 351(2), 303(2), of BNS, 2023.

¶15

Allegation against the petitioner is that he gave a Khanti blow on the head of Pintu Yadav. Further allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith co-accused person, namely, Mukesh Yadav dragged the informant’s wife on the ground due to which she became disrobed.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87320 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 2/4

¶17

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the present case is counter blast of Raghopur P.S.Case No.130/2025. Although the petitioner is named in the FIR and the specific allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith other co-accused person assaulted to one Pintu Yadav. Although Pintu Yadav has received the injury but the injury report of Pintu Yadav suggests that the injury is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner is named in the FIR and there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner that he is the order-giver of the present occurrence and apart from that he also assaulted to one Pintu Yadav and Pintu Yadav has received the injury. Further submits that the petitioner carries two more cases other than the present one but fairly submits that the petitioner is on bail in both the cases, as mentioned in para-3 of the bail petition.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts, there is case and counter case, injury inflicted upon the injured person is simple in nature, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87320 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 3/4

¶21

thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-1, Birpur in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No.132 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions:-

¶22

(I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶23

(II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶24

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his/her criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87320 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 4/4

¶26

acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶27

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶28

Nitesh/-

¶29

U T

Shibu Yadav @ Shivshankar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shibu Yadav @ Shivshankar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yasmin Aash @ Yasmina Parween @ Yasmina Parweena Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Usha Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Mantun Kumar @ Mantu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Singh @ Pramod Kumar @ Gannauri Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar