Allowed¶21

Saurabh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Jan 2026CR. MISC./85900/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna HC, Crl. Misc. No.85900 of 2025, order dt. 13-01-2026, Rudra Prakash Mishra, J. Bail allowed under Arms Act Ss. 25(1-B)(a), 26, 35 (Sangrampur PS Case 251/2025, East Champaran); pistol recovered from co-accused Vikash Kumar, not petitioner; custody since 27.06.2025; no antecedents; S.103 BNSS 2023 compliance raised; bail bonds Rs. 15,000/- plus two like sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted; petitioner to be released on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 251 of 2025. ¶21

Saurabh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85900 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-251 Year-2025 Thana- SANGRAMPUR District- East

¶3

Champaran

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Saurabh Kumar S/O Rajdeo Ram Resident of Dipau Mod, Ward No.3, P.S.Kotwa @ Katwa, District- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Samir Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 13-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶13

learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 251 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶15

The prosecution case, in short, is that there is recovery of one loaded pistol from the possession of co-accused person.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85900 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026 2/2

¶18

the petitioner also submits that no recovery of arms have been made from the possession of the petitioner rather the same has been recovered from the possession of co-accused, namely, Vikash Kumar. It is further submitted that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of arms. The petitioner is in custody since 27.06.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶19

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 251 of 2025.

¶22

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶23

Rajorshi/-

¶24

U T

Saurabh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saurabh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ratish Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Dipu Kumar @ Deepu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Sharma @ Pawan Kumar Shrma @ Pawan Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Birju Paswan Vs The State of Bihar