Disposed

Sandeep Kumar @ Sandip Kumar @ Gobbar @ Gabbar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Feb 2026CR. MISC./8585/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail petition for a petitioner implicated in a robbery/snatching case through a co-accused's confessional statement, in judicial custody since November 2025. Court considered criminal antecedent of one case and enlarged the petitioner on bail.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount to satisfaction of A.C.J.M.-II, Nawada

Sandeep Kumar @ Sandip Kumar @ Gobbar @ Gabbar Vs The State of… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8585 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-462 Year-2025 Thana- PAKARIBARAW District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sandeep Kumar @ Sandip Kumar @ Gobbar @ Gabbar S/o- Chandrika Paswan @ Chanrik Vill - Bahadurpur, P.S - Kasar, Dist - Sheikhpura

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 17-02-2026

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 310(2), 311 & 317(3) of the BNS.

¶13

The case of the prosecution, in short, is that six persons on two bikes apprehended the informant and assaulted him by striking on his head by butt of a pistol and snatched his mobile phone. On alarm being raised, one of the accused was apprehended who is identified as Deepak and Deepak has disclosed the name of two absconding accused persons as Nawlesh and Rahul.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of this petitioner has surfaced in the confessional

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8585 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026 2/2

¶16

statement of Nawlesh. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that save and except the confessional statement of Nawlesh, there is nothing against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and no TIP was conducted. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 21.11.2025.

¶17

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the bail and has submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 462 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-II, Nawada.

¶19

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶20

durgesh/-

¶21

U T

Sandeep Kumar @ Sandip Kumar @ Gobbar @ Gabbar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Kumar @ Sandip Kumar @ Gobbar @ Gabbar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akash Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Govinda Sahani @ Govind Sahani @ Gobinda Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Azad Kumar @ Azad Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Kunal Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar Paswan @ Rohit Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Hasmat Ansari Vs The State of Bihar