Allowed¶22

Kundan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC31 Jan 2026CR. MISC./84101/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.84101 of 2025; Kundan Kumar v. The State of Bihar; bail granted; Section 309(6) B.N.S.; Harnaut P.S. Case No. 388 of 2025; District Nalanda; mobile and bike snatching; stolen bike recovered from bushes; confessional statement; judicial custody since 01.09.2025; bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Biharsharif; Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey; order dated 31-01-2026.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Biharsharif at Nalanda, in connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 388 of 2025. ¶22

Kundan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84101 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-388 Year-2025 Thana- HARNAUT District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Kundan Kumar, Son of Doman Bind @ Doman Jamadar, Resident of VillageNiyamatpur, P.S.- Harnaut, District- Nalanda

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Paras Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 31-01-2026

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 388 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(6) of B.N.S.

¶17

The case of the prosecution, in short, is that two persons on a bike have snatched the mobile of the informant and bike.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The F.I.R. was lodged against unknown miscreants and from perusal of the seizure list it is clear that the stolen bike was recovered from the bushes. Nothing has been recovered from his

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84101 of 2025(3) dt.31-01-2026 2/2

¶20

possession. His name has surfaced during his confessional statement. Save and except his confessional statement, nothing is there against him. He is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 01.09.2025.

¶21

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

¶22

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Biharsharif at Nalanda in connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 388 of 2025.

¶23

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶24

lata/- U T

Kundan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kundan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar Yadav @ Golu Vs The State of Bihar

Abdullah Vs The State of Bihar

Gautam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Rojit Uddin Vs The State of Bihar

Babu Lal Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Vishal Sahani Vs The State of Bihar